Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31206945›Full record

SynthesisHealth & social care in the community2019

Men's Sheds: A conceptual exploration of the causal pathways for health and well-being.

Danielle Kelly, Artur Steiner, Helen Mason, Simon Teasdale

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health & social care in the community, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Impacts of Engagement in Men's Sheds on Incidental Physical Activity and Wellbeing Outcomes.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  8. Gender-specific analysis of social connection patterns and risk of dementia in community-dwelling older people.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danielle KellyYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9609-0156
Artur SteinerYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Helen MasonYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Simon TeasdaleYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

Big Lottery Fund 31049855Economic and Social Research Council MR/L003287/1Medical Research Council MR/L003287/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although men have a lower life expectancy than women, and are more susceptible to illness, they have been found to be less likely to engage in health-seeking behaviour. Men's Sheds, as a gendered intervention, has been identified as an effective way to engage men in meaningful activity and gain social support from others. However, links between sheds and health and well-being are not well-documented, and evidence is lacking of the potential causal pathways to health generation. This study aims to develop a plausible empirically based causal theory of how Men's Sheds influence the health and well-being of their participants and to set out future research directions to test this theory. Drawing on a scoping review of academic, peer-reviewed journal articles published between 1990 and 2018, potential causal linkages between shed activity and health and well-being outcomes are synthesised into a logic model framework. Sixteen relevant peer-reviewed journal were identified from the academic literature. The data from the articles are predominantly self-reported, and characterised by small sample sizes and/ or low response rates. Further, information is lacking on the demographics of Men's Shed participants and the contexts in which they exist. Most notably, while there is some evidence on the potential mental health and social well-being impacts of shed activities, physical health is less documented. The study shows that there is a lack of reliable and systematic evidence of the potential causal pathways between Men's Shed activities and health and well-being outcomes. In order to address research gaps, further research is required to test and develop the proposed theory and logic model.

Indexed as

Health StatusMen's HealthMental HealthGender IdentityHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareSocial SupportSocioeconomic Factorscausal pathwayshealthmenMen's Shedwell-being

Identifiers

PMID31206945
PMCPMC6772158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.