Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31206917›Full record

SynthesisPsycho-oncology2019

Interventions to enhance self-efficacy in cancer patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Thomas V Merluzzi, James E Pustejovsky, Errol J Philip, Stephanie J Sohl, Mark Berendsen, John M Salsman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psycho-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07582666 (A Resource-Based Psychological Intervention to Enhance Well-Being in Cancer Participants), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07582666 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Resource-Based Psychological Intervention to Enhance Well-Being in Cancer Participants: Acceptability, Feasibility and Effects of the CAERES Protocol (Cancer Auto-Evaluation of RESources) - A Pilot Study in Italian-Speaking Switzerland

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniDistance SuisseRan2021 to 2022Enrolled32ConditionsSelf Efficacy, Neoplasms (Cancer / Tumors), Cancer-related Fatigue, Post-Traumatic Growth, PsychologicalArmsCAERES (Cancer Auto-Evaluation of RESources) Psychosocial Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Improving self-efficacy through nurse navigation in patients during treatment for colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Evaluating a shared care pathway intervention for people receiving chemotherapy to reduce post-treatment unplanned hospital presentations: a randomised controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Tailored Approach to Sleep Health Education (TASHE): a randomized controlled trial of a web-based application.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2020
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas V MerluzziDepartment of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0001-9320-9548
James E PustejovskyDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-0591-9465
Errol J PhilipDepartment of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Indiana.ORCID 0000-0002-1320-6708
Stephanie J SohlDepartment of Social Science and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-4717-0328
Mark BerendsenGalter Health Science Library, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0002-2929-5952
John M SalsmanDepartment of Social Science and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, North Carolina.
University of Notre Dame · USWake Forest University · USNorthwestern University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

A Behavioral Integrative Intervention for Reducing Cancer-related FatigueK01AT008219 · NCCIH · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SOHL, STEPHANIE JEAN · 2015 to 2018
$493k
Meta-Analysis of Positive Psychology Interventions for Cancer (MAPPIC)R03CA184560 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SALSMAN, JOHN · 2014 to 2015
$155k
NCCIH NIH HHS K01 AT008219NCCIH NIH HHS K01AT008219NCI NIH HHS R03 CA184560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSelf-efficacy expectations are associated with improvements in problematic outcomes widely considered clinically significant (ie, emotional distress, fatigue, and pain), related to positive health behaviors, and as a type of personal agency, inherently valuable. Self-efficacy expectancies, estimates of confidence to execute behaviors, are important in that changes in self-efficacy expectations are positively related to future behaviors that promote health and well-being. The current meta-analysis investigated the impact of psychological interventions on self-efficacy expectations for a variety of health behaviors among cancer patients.

methodsOvid Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched with specific search terms for identifying randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that focused on psychologically based interventions. Included studies had (a) an adult cancer sample, (b) a self-efficacy expectation measure of specific behaviors, and (c) an RCT design. Standard screening and reliability procedures were used for selecting and coding studies. Coding included theoretically informed moderator variables.

resultsAcross 79 RCTs, 223 effect sizes, and 8678 participants, the weighted average effect of self-efficacy expectations was estimated as g = 0.274 (P < .001). Consistent with the self-efficacy theory, the average effect for in-person intervention delivery (g = 0.329) was significantly greater than for all other formats (g = 0.154, P = .023; eg, audiovisual, print, telephone, and Web/internet).

conclusionsThe results establish the impact of psychological interventions on self-efficacy expectations as comparable in effect size with commonly reported outcomes (distress, fatigue, pain). Additionally, the result that in-person interventions achieved the largest effect is supported by the social learning theory and could inform research related to the development and evaluation of interventions.

Indexed as

Self EfficacyHumansNeoplasmsPsychotherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as Topiccancerinterventionmeta-analysisoncologyRCTsself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID31206917
PMCPMC6731146
OpenAlexW2951606584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.