Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31206661›Full record

ReviewJournal of anatomy2019

How are the cardiomyocytes aggregated together within the walls of the left ventricular cone?

Robert H Anderson, Peter F Niederer, Damian Sanchez-Quintana, Robert S Stephenson, Peter Agger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anatomy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Myocardial mesostructure and mesofunction.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessing Myocardial Architecture: The Challenges and Controversies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Cardiac multi-scale investigation of the right and left ventricleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020
    Review
  11. Journal of Anatomy January 2020.Journal of anatomy · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Robert H AndersonInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5163-9021
Peter F NiedererETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Damian Sanchez-QuintanaDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
Robert S StephensonInstitute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Peter AggerComparative Medicine Laboratory, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKETH Zurich · CHNewcastle University · GBUniversidad de Extremadura · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The manner of packing together of the cardiomyocytes within the walls of the cardiac ventricles has now been investigated for over half a millennium. In 1669, Lower dissected the ventricular mass, likening the arrangement to skeletal musculature, in the form of a myocardial band extending between the right and left atrioventricular junctions. Pettigrew subsequently showed obvious helical arrangements to be evident within the ventricular walls, but emphasised that the cardiomyocytes were attached to each other, and could not justifiably be compared with skeletal cardiomyocytes. Torrent-Guasp then reactivated the notion that the ventricular mass was formed of a solitary band. Unlike Lower, he dissected the band as extending between the pulmonary to the aortic roots. Multiple investigations conducted using gross dissection and histology, and more recently diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomographic analysis, have shown an absence of any anatomical boundaries within the walls that might permit the mass uniformly to be dissected so as to reveal the band. A response to a recent letter to the Journal, nonetheless, claimed that the dissections had been validated by clinicians interpreting the findings so as to provide an explanation for ventricular cardiodynamics, arguing that the findings provided a suitable anatomical model for this purpose. Anatomical models, however, are of no value unless they are anatomically correct. In this review, therefore, we summarise the evidence showing that the cardiomyocytes making up the ventricular walls, rather than forming a ventricular myocardial band, are instead aggregated together to form a three-dimensional myocardial mesh.

Indexed as

Heart VentriclesHumansMyocytes, Cardiacaggregated cardiomyocytesfibrous matrixhelical heartventricular myocardial band

Identifiers

PMID31206661
PMCPMC6742897
OpenAlexW2952834815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.