Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31206612›Full record

SynthesisClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2019

Digital Learning to Improve Safe and Effective Prescribing: A Systematic Review.

Michiel J Bakkum, Jelle Tichelaar, Anne Wellink, Milan C Richir, Michiel A van Agtmael

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. What should be updated in the WHO guide to good prescribing?European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A scoping review and expert consensus on digital determinants of health.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. WHO guide to good prescribing is 25 years old: quo vadis?European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michiel J BakkumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jelle TichelaarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anne WellinkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Milan C RichirDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michiel A van AgtmaelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the aim to modernize and harmonize prescribing education, the European Association for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (EACPT) Working Group on education recommended the extensive use and distribution of digital learning resources (DLRs). However, it is unclear whether the complex task of prescribing medicine can be taught digitally. Therefore, the aim of this review was to investigate the effect of diverse DLRs in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics education. Databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, and CENTRAL were systematically searched. Sixty-five articles were included in the analyses. Direct effects on patients were studied, but not detected, in six articles. Skills and behavior were studied in 11 articles, 8 of which reported positive effects. Knowledge acquisition was investigated in 19 articles, all with positive effects. Qualitative analyses yielded 10 recommendations for the future development of DLRs. Digital learning is effective in teaching knowledge, attitudes, and skills associated with safe and effective prescribing.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionClinical CompetenceDrug PrescriptionsEducation, MedicalEducation, NursingEducation, PharmacyHealth PersonnelHumansLearningPharmacology, Clinical

Identifiers

PMID31206612
PMCPMC6896235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.