ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2020
Evaluating important change in cutaneous disease activity as an efficacy measure for clinical trials in dermatomyositis.
Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-targeted immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapies for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Lenabasum, a Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2 Agonist, in Patients with Dermatomyositis with Refractory Skin Disease: Follow-Up Data from a 3-Year Open-Label Extension Study.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025Trial
- Safety and Efficacy of Lenabasum, a Cannabinoid Receptor Type 2 Agonist, in Patients with Dermatomyositis with Refractory Skin Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2022Trial
- Beyond Survival: Measuring Treatment Tolerability with Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Lymphoma Immunotherapy Era.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2026Review
- Update on clinimetric assessments in juvenile dermatomyositis: conceptual foundations, current tools, and future directions : (Narrative review describing the development, validation, and application of clinimetric outcome measures in juvenile dermatomyositis).Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2026Review
- Chronic graft-versus-host disease has similar or worse impact on skin-specific quality of life than autoimmune connective tissue diseases: A cross-sectional study.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2026Article
- Rapid Onset of Response in Adults with Dermatomyositis Receiving Dazukibart: A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Divergence in Estimated Risks and Actual Rates of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Events and their Management in a Longitudinal Cohort of Patients with Dermatomyositis with Skin Involvement.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025Article
- Development and Evaluation of the Dermatomyositis Outcomes for Muscle and Skin as an Outcome Measure in Dermatomyositis Clinical Trials.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025Article
- Article
- Cutaneous Manifestations in Patients with Dermatomyositis, Are They Only Skin Deep?Dermatology and therapy · 2024Article
- Updates in Dermatomyositis: Newer Treatment Options and Outcome Measures From Dermatologic Perspectives.Annals of dermatology · 2024Review
- Dermatomyositis: Practical Guidance and Unmet Needs.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2024Review
- Efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) in improving skin symptoms in patients with dermatomyositis: a post-hoc analysis of the ProDERM study.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Trial of Intravenous Immune Globulin in Dermatomyositis.The New England journal of medicine · 2023Article
- Mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate efficacy in dermatomyositis.The British journal of dermatology · 2022Article
- The Meaning and Reliability of Minimal Important Differences (MIDs) for Clinician-Reported Outcome Measures (ClinROMs) in Dermatology-A Scoping Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Study of Tofacitinib in Refractory Dermatomyositis: An Open-Label Pilot Study of Ten Patients.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2021Article
- The validity and utility of the Cutaneous Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) as a clinical outcome instrument in dermatomyositis: A comprehensive review.Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients may experience improved quality of life (QoL) without complete clearance of skin disease. The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CDASI-A) score correlates with the Symptoms and Emotions subscales of Skindex-29, a measure of QoL, down to CDASI-A scores of 7 points (for Symptoms) and 10 points (for Emotions).
objectivesOur goal was to define an important change in disease activity, as measured by the CDASI-A, that results in a meaningful change in QoL in patients with dermatomyositis.
methodsIn 103 patients, we assessed the percentage change and actual change in CDASI-A scores needed to achieve a meaningful improvement in QoL, using linear regression models.
resultsWe found that meaningful improvement correlates with 7·86 points (P < 0·001) in Symptoms, and 10·29 points (P < 0·001) in Emotions, after correlating Skindex-29 to an established definition of meaningful change in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). For patients with initial CDASI-A scores > 14 points, a 40% change in CDASI-A between the first two visits suggests a meaningful change in Skindex-29. In patients with moderate initial CDASI-A (15-26 points), the changes in CDASI-A resulting in meaningful changes in Symptoms and Emotions were 6 points (P < 0·001) and 7 points (P < 0·001), respectively. For initial CDASI-A scores in the severe range (27-35 points), an improvement in CDASI-A by 11 points (P = 0·030) and 9 points (P = 0·021) leads to a meaningful change in Symptoms and Emotions, respectively.
conclusionsIn patients with an initial CDASI-A score > 14 points, a 40% change in the CDASI-A score can be used to indicate a meaningful change in QoL in future dermatomyositis trials. What's already known about this topic? The Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) is a validated disease assessment tool used to capture the extent of cutaneous activity and damage. The Skindex-29 and Dermatology Life Quality Index are standardized and validated measures of quality of life (QoL) for clinical trials and correlate with CDASI Activity (CDASI-A) scores. What does this study add? We identified what change in Skindex-29 scores over two consecutive visits would indicate an important change (a minimal clinically important difference) in QoL. We determined which change in CDASI-A scores over two consecutive visits would lead to a meaningful change in QoL. For patients with an initial CDASI-A score > 14 points, a 40% change in the CDASI-A score over two visits is associated with a meaningful change in QoL. What are the clinical implications of this work? Clinical trials can consider using a 40% change in the CDASI-A score as an end point when assessing the clinical efficacy of drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.