Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31206551›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Genetic admixture patterns in Argentinian Patagonia.

María Laura Parolin, Ulises F Toscanini, Irina F Velázquez, Cintia Llull, Gabriela L Berardi, Alfredo Holley, Camila Tamburrini, Sergio Avena, Francisco R Carnese, José L Lanata and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

María Laura ParolinInstituto de Diversidad y Evolución Austral (IDEAus), CCT CONICET-CENPAT, Puerto Madryn, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-6726-2943
Ulises F ToscaniniPrimer Centro Argentino de Inmunogenética (PRICAI), Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Irina F VelázquezInstituto de Diversidad y Evolución Austral (IDEAus), CCT CONICET-CENPAT, Puerto Madryn, Argentina.
Cintia LlullPrimer Centro Argentino de Inmunogenética (PRICAI), Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gabriela L BerardiPrimer Centro Argentino de Inmunogenética (PRICAI), Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Alfredo HolleyInstituto de Diversidad y Evolución Austral (IDEAus), CCT CONICET-CENPAT, Puerto Madryn, Argentina.
Camila TamburriniInstituto de Diversidad y Evolución Austral (IDEAus), CCT CONICET-CENPAT, Puerto Madryn, Argentina.
Sergio AvenaInstituto de Ciencias Antropológicas (ICA), Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Francisco R CarneseInstituto de Ciencias Antropológicas (ICA), Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
José L LanataInstituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio (IIDyPCa), CONICET-UNRN, San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-3606-4239
Noela Sánchez CarneroCentro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos (CECIMAR), CCT CONICET-CENPAT, Puerto Madryn, Argentina.
Lucas F ArceInstituto de Diversidad y Evolución Austral (IDEAus), CCT CONICET-CENPAT, Puerto Madryn, Argentina.
Néstor G BassoInstituto de Diversidad y Evolución Austral (IDEAus), CCT CONICET-CENPAT, Puerto Madryn, Argentina.
Rui PereiraInstitute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.
Leonor GusmãoInstitute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As in other Latin American populations, Argentinians are the result of the admixture amongst different continental groups, mainly from America and Europe, and to a lesser extent from Sub-Saharan Africa. However, it is known that the admixture processes did not occur homogeneously throughout the country. Therefore, considering the importance for anthropological, medical and forensic researches, this study aimed to investigate the population genetic structure of the Argentinian Patagonia, through the analysis of 46 ancestry informative markers, in 433 individuals from five different localities. Overall, in the Patagonian sample, the average individual ancestry was estimated as 35.8% Native American (95% CI: 32.2-39.4%), 62.1% European (58.5-65.7%) and 2.1% African (1.7-2.4%). Comparing the five localities studied, statistically significant differences were observed for the Native American and European contributions, but not for the African ancestry. The admixture results combined with the genealogical information revealed intra-regional variations that are consistent with the different geographic origin of the participants and their ancestors. As expected, a high European ancestry was observed for donors with four grandparents born in Europe (96.8%) or in the Central region of Argentina (85%). In contrast, the Native American ancestry increased when the four grandparents were born in the North (71%) or in the South (61.9%) regions of the country, or even in Chile (60.5%). In summary, our results showed that differences on continental ancestry contribution have different origins in each region in Patagonia, and even in each locality, highlighting the importance of knowing the origin of the participants and their ancestors for the correct interpretation and contextualization of the genetic information.

Indexed as

ArgentinaBlack PeopleEthnicityGenetics, PopulationHumansIndians, North AmericanPedigreeWhite People

Identifiers

PMID31206551
PMCPMC6576754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.