Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31206549›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Longitudinal microbiome profiling reveals impermanence of probiotic bacteria in domestic pigeons.

Kirsten Grond, Julie M Perreau, Wesley T Loo, A James Spring, Colleen M Cavanaugh, Sarah M Hird

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Microorganisms · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kirsten GrondDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6197-7139
Julie M PerreauDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Wesley T LooDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
A James SpringIndependent Researcher: Sutton, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Colleen M CavanaughDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Sarah M HirdDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics are bacterial species or assemblages that are applied to animals and plants with the intention of altering the microbiome in a beneficial way. Probiotics have been linked to positive health effects such as faster disease recovery times in humans and increased weight gain in poultry. Pigeon fanciers often feed their show pigeons probiotics with the intention of increasing flight performance. The objective of our study was to determine the effect of two different probiotics, alone and in combination, on the fecal microbiome of Birmingham Roller pigeons. We sequenced fecal samples from 20 pigeons divided into three probiotic treatments, including prior to, during, and after treatment. Pre-treatment and control group samples were dominated by Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Cyanobacteria. Administration of a probiotic pellet containing Enterococcus faecium and Lactobacillus acidophilus resulted in increase in average relative abundance of Lactobacillus spp. from 4.7 ± 2.0% to 93.0 ± 5.3%. No significant effects of Enterococcus spp. were detected. Probiotic-induced shifts in the microbiome composition were temporary and disappeared within 2 days of probiotic cessation. Administration of a probiotic powder in drinking water that contained Enterococcus faecium and three Lactobacillus species had minimal effect on the microbiome. We conclude that supplementing Birmingham roller pigeons with the probiotic pellets, but not the probiotic powder, temporarily changed the microbiome composition. A next step is to experimentally test the effect of these changes in microbiome composition on host health and physical performance.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal FeedAnimalsColumbidaeEnterococcus faeciumFecesLactobacillus acidophilusProbioticsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31206549
PMCPMC6578490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.