Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31206547›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Frequent sugar feeding behavior by Aedes aegypti in Bamako, Mali makes them ideal candidates for control with attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB).

Fatoumata Sissoko, Amy Junnila, Mohamad M Traore, Sekou F Traore, Seydou Doumbia, Seydou Mamadou Dembele, Yosef Schlein, Amadou Sekou Traore, Petrányi Gergely, Rui-De Xue and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Fatoumata SissokoMalaria Research and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odonto-Stomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technology of Bamako, Bamako, Mali.
Amy JunnilaDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Kuvin Centre for the Study of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-8321-7808
Mohamad M TraoreMalaria Research and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odonto-Stomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technology of Bamako, Bamako, Mali.
Sekou F TraoreMalaria Research and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odonto-Stomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technology of Bamako, Bamako, Mali.
Seydou DoumbiaMalaria Research and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odonto-Stomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technology of Bamako, Bamako, Mali.
Seydou Mamadou DembeleMalaria Research and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odonto-Stomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technology of Bamako, Bamako, Mali.
Yosef SchleinDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, IMRIC, Kuvin Centre for the Study of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Amadou Sekou TraoreMalaria Research and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odonto-Stomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technology of Bamako, Bamako, Mali.
Petrányi GergelyZoologische Staatssammlung München, Munich, Germany.
Rui-De XueAnastasia Mosquito Control District, St. Augustine, FL, United States of America.
Kristopher L ArheartDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7699-2278
Edita E RevayDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
Vasiliy D KravchenkoDepartment of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
John C BeierDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Gunter C MüllerMalaria Research and Training Center, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odonto-Stomatology, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technology of Bamako, Bamako, Mali.

Funding

Multidisciplinary Implementation Research for malaria control and elimination in West AfricaU19AI129387 · NIAID · UNIV OF SCIENCES, TECH & TECH OF BAMAKO · PI Mahamoudou Toure · 2017 to 2026
$8.2M
Training Program on Operational and Health Services Research for Malaria in MaliD43TW008652 · FIC · UNIV OF SCIENCES, TECH & TECH OF BAMAKO · PI SEYDOU DOUMBIA, Alexandre Delamou · 2010 to 2026
$3.1M
Outdoor Resting and Sugar Feeding Behaviors of African Malaria VectorsR01AI100968 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BEIER, JOHN C. · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW008652NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI100968NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI129387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent tools and strategies are not sufficient to reliably address threats and outbreaks of arboviruses including Zika, dengue, chikungunya, and yellow fever. Hence there is a growing public health challenge to identify the best new control tools to use against the vector Aedes aegypti. In this study, we investigated Ae. aegypti sugar feeding strategies in Bamako, Mali, to determine if this species can be controlled effectively using attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSB). METHODOLOGY: We determined the relative attraction of Ae. aegypti males and females to a variety of sugar sources including flowers, fruits, seedpods, and honeydew in the laboratory and using plant-baited traps in the field. Next, we observed the rhythm of blood feeding versus sugar feeding activity of Ae. aegypti in vegetation and in open areas. Finally, we studied the effectiveness of spraying vegetation with ATSB on Ae. aegypti in sugar rich (lush vegetation) and in sugar poor (sparse vegetation) urban environments. PRINCIPAL

findingsMale and female laboratory sugar feeding rates within 24 h, on 8 of 16 plants offered were over 80%. The survival rates of mosquitoes on several plant sources were nearly as long as that of controls maintained on sucrose solution. In the field, females were highly attracted to 11 of 20 sugar sources, and 8 of these were attractive to males. Peak periods of host attraction for blood-feeding and sugar feeding in open areas were nearly identical and occurred shortly after sunrise and around sunset. In shaded areas, the first sugar-seeking peak occurred between 11:30 and 12:30 while the second was from 16:30 to 17:30. In a 50-day field trial, ATSB significantly reduced mean numbers of landing / biting female Ae. aegypti in the two types of vegetation. At sugar poor sites, the mean pre-treatment catch of 20.51 females on day 14 was reduced 70-fold to 0.29 on day 50. At sugar rich sites, the mean pre-treatment catch of 32.46 females on day 14 was reduced 10-fold to a mean of 3.20 females on day 50.

conclusionsThis is the first study to show how the vector Ae. aegypti depends on environmental resources of sugar for feeding and survival. The demonstration that Ae. aegypti populations rapidly collapsed after ATSB treatment, in both sugar rich and sugar poor environments, is strong evidence that Ae. aegypti is sugar-feeding frequently. Indeed, this study clearly demonstrates that Ae. aegypti mosquitoes depend on natural sugar resources, and a promising new method for vector control, ATSB, can be highly effective in the fight against Aedes-transmitted diseases.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorAedesAnimalsDisease VectorsFemaleInsecticidesMaleMaliMosquito ControlSucroseZika Virus InfectionInsecticidesSucrose

Identifiers

PMID31206547
PMCPMC6576782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.