ReviewClinical obstetrics and gynecology2019
Positive Deviance to Address Health Equity in Quality and Safety in Obstetrics.
Review in Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Strategies to Promote Maternal Health Equity: The Role of Perinatal Quality Collaboratives.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Review
- Characteristics of High Versus Low-Performing Hospitals for Very Preterm Infant Morbidity and Mortality.The journal of pediatrics: X · 2023Article
- Multicentre positive deviance to reduce adverse events and length of stay after pulmonary resection.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Distinguishing High-Performing From Low-Performing Hospitals for Severe Maternal Morbidity: A Focus on Quality and Equity.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2022Article
- Article
- Human Papillomavirus Immunization in Rural Primary Care.American journal of preventive medicine · 2020Article
- Race and Ethnicity, Medical Insurance, and Within-Hospital Severe Maternal Morbidity Disparities.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Racial/ethnic disparities persist in obstetrical outcomes. In this paper, we ask how research in obstetrical quality can go beyond a purely quantitative approach to tackle the challenge of health inequity in quality and safety. This overview debriefs the use of positive deviance and mixed methods in others areas of medicine, describes the shortcomings of quantitative methods in obstetrics and presents qualitative studies carried out in obstetrics as well as the insights provided by this method. The article concludes by proposing positive deviance as a mixed methods approach to generate new knowledge for addressing racial and ethnic disparities in maternal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.