ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2019
The relationship between preliminary efficacy and prognosis after first-line
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- EGFR mutation analysis on circulating free DNA in NSCLC: a single-center experience.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Pemetrexed-based chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer patients withTranslational lung cancer research · 2020Article
- Low T790M relative allele frequency indicates concurrent resistance mechanisms and poor responsiveness to osimertinib.Translational lung cancer research · 2020Article
- Hormone receptor expression correlates with EGFR gene mutation in lung cancer in patients with simultaneous primary breast cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2020Article
- Dynamic changes of acquired T790M mutation and small cell lung cancer transformation in a patient with EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma after first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs: a case report.Translational lung cancer research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNowadays, patients with
methodsA total of 82 patients with
resultsOf a total of 82 patients, 42 (51.2%) patients achieved partial response (PR) within 1 month, and 40 (48.8%) patients achieved stable disease (SD: -30% to 0) within 1 month. The median PFS among all patients was 10 months. The median PFS in patients achieving PR within 1 month was 10.0 months. The median PFS in patients achieving SD (-30% to 0) within 1 month was 9.3 months. There was no statistically significant difference between PR within 1 month and SD (-30% to 0) within 1 month (P=0.620). In the
conclusionsFor patients with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.