ArticleCureus2019
A Feasibility Study for the Production of Three-dimensional-printed Spine Models Using Simultaneously Extruded Thermoplastic Polymers.
Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Main elements of current spine biomechanics research: model, installation and test data.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Emerging Biomedical and Clinical Applications of 3D-Printed Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Devices and Delivery Systems.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Fuzzy Controller Implemented for Movement of a Tendon-Driven 3D Robotic Lumbar Spine Mechanism.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- 3D printing in spine care: A review of current applications.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2022Article
- The SpineBox: A Freely Available, Open-access, 3D-printed Simulator Design for Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement.Cureus · 2020Article
- Orientation Planning in the Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing of Anatomical Spine Models.Cureus · 2020Article
- Investigation and Feasibility of Combined 3D Printed Thermoplastic Filament and Polymeric Foam to Simulate the Cortiocancellous Interface of Human Vertebrae.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Hybrid computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging 3D printed models for neurosurgery planning.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Review
- Cervicothoracic Manipulation Techniques Reviewed Utilizing Three-Dimensional Spine Model.Cureus · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Medical simulation is an emerging field for resident training. Three-dimensional printing has accelerated the development of models for spine surgical simulation. Previous models have utilized augmented infill ratios to simulate the density difference between cortical and cancellous bone; however, this does not fully account for differences in the material properties of these components of human vertebrae. In order to replicate the differences in both density and material characteristics for realistic spinal simulation, we created a three-dimensional model composed of multiple thermoplastic polymers. Materials and methods Three lumbar vertebrae and 20 C2 vertebrae models using an experimental dual material fabrication method were printed on an Ultimaker S5 3D printer. Assessment of model integrity during instrumentation as well as user tactile feedback were points of interest to determine prototype viability for educational and biomechanical use. The experimental cohort was compared with a control cohort consisting of a single material print, resin print, and polyurethane mold. Results Based on tactile feedback, the experimental dual material print (polylactic acid [PLA]/polyvinyl alcohol [PVA]) more accurately represented the sensation of in vivo instrumentation during pedicle probing, pedicle tapping, and screw placement. There were no instrumentation or material failures in the PLA/PVA experimental model cohort. Conclusions This feasibility study indicates that multiple material printing using PLA and PVA is a viable method to replicate the cortico-cancellous interface in vertebral models. This concept and design using our unique infill algorithm have not been yet reported in the medical literature. Further educational and biomechanical testing on our design is currently underway to establish this printing method as a new standard for spinal biomimetic modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.