ArticleCurrent surgery reports2019
Resuscitation Strategies for Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in Current surgery reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Review of Fluid Resuscitation Strategies in Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Results of therapy in children diagnosed with severe traumatic brain injury.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Overview of Wearable Healthcare Devices for Clinical Decision Support in the Prehospital Setting.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Albumin in Normovolemic Fluid Management for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Controversies and Research Gaps.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Global traumatic brain injury intracranial pressure: from monitoring to surgical decision.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Traumatic Brain Injury-A Review of Intravenous Fluid Therapy.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Review
- Risk factors for corticosteroid insufficiency during the sub-acute phase of acute traumatic brain injury.Neural regeneration research · 2020Article
- Hyperosmolar Treatment for Patients at Risk for Increased Intracranial Pressure: A Single-Center Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Nonoperative management of splenic injury in closely monitored patients with reduced consciousness is safe and feasible.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality; however, little definitive evidence exists about most clinical management strategies. Here, we highlight important differences between two major guidelines, the 2016 Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines and the Lund Concept, along with recent pre-clinical and clinical data. RECENT
findingsWhile intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring has been questioned, the majority of literature demonstrates benefit in severe TBI. The optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and ICP are yet unknown, but likely as important is the concept of ICP burden. The evidence for anti-hypertensive therapy is strengthening. Decompressive craniectomy improves mortality, but at the cost of increased morbidity. Plasma-based resuscitation has demonstrated benefit in multiple pre-clinical TBI studies. SUMMARY: The management of hemodynamics and intravascular volume are crucial in TBI. Based on recent evidence, ICP monitoring, anti-hypertensive therapy, minimal use of vasopressors/inotropes, and plasma resuscitation may improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.