Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31205750›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2019

Co-producing a shared understanding and definition of empowerment with people with dementia.

Tracey McConnell, Tristan Sturm, Mabel Stevenson, Noleen McCorry, Michael Donnelly, Brian J Taylor, Paul Best

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rationale and design of a multidomain lifestyle program for mild cognitive impairment.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Engaging With a Community of Practice in Dementia: Impacts on Skills, Knowledge, Networks and Accessing Support.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Public involvement in chronic respiratory diseases research: A qualitative study of patients', carers' and citizens' perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Living Well with Dementia: Feeling Empowered through Interaction with Their Social Environment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. It takes three to tango: An ethnography of triadic involvement of residents, families and nurses in long-term dementia care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Health-related quality of life in elderly, multimorbid individuals with and without depression and/or mild cognitive impairment using a telemonitoring application.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  19. Aging 4.0? Rethinking the ethical framing of technology-assisted eldercare.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tracey McConnell1School of Social Science, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Tristan Sturm2School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5757-0117
Mabel StevensonNI Statistics & Research Agency, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Noleen McCorry4Centre for Excellence for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Michael Donnelly4Centre for Excellence for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Brian J Taylor5School of Applied Social and Policy Sciences, Ulster University, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Paul Best6Centre for Evidence and Social Innovation, School of Social Science, Education and Social Work, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K023241/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmpowerment for people with dementia (PWD) is not well defined within the research literature and we feel that this is an important area for development. It is important to seek, consult, and co-produce such a definition with PWD who are more actively involved in their communities post diagnosis (e.g. no longer the 'long goodbye'). This study seeks to combine academic literature review methods with participatory/co-production methods in order to address this gap. We feel this approach also adds to developing methodologies in the field of co-production and user involvement.

methodsWe use a unique approach toward a definition of empowerment for PWD.

resultsPhase 1 and 2 led to a definition of empowerment relevant to PWD. This shared understanding of empowerment was defined by PWD as 'A confidence building process whereby PWD are respected, have a voice and are heard, are involved in making decisions about their lives and have the opportunity to create change through access to appropriate resources'.

conclusionsThe strength of this research lies in addressing the current confusion and arbitrariness of empowerment within the context of dementia. This coproduced work also provides evidence for not only the possibility, but also the added value of involving PWD in research in terms of unique insights afforded by their lived experiences.

Indexed as

Co-productionDementiaEmpowermentNarrative summaryParticipation and empowermentScoping review

Identifiers

PMID31205750
PMCPMC6558688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.