ReviewFrontline gastroenterology2019
Improving safety and reducing error in endoscopy: simulation training in human factors.
Review in Frontline gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-technical skills in the management of endoscopic adverse events.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Patients' Experiences of Diagnostic and Therapeutic High-Resolution Endoscopy in Treating Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions: A Qualitative Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- In-situ simulation-based team training reduces incidence of negative events during bronchoscopy. A prospective educational intervention cohort study.Respiratory research · 2025Article
- Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Use Cases in Gastroenterology.Current gastroenterology reports · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a simulation-based assessment tool in colonoscopy.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2023Article
- Who will excel in advanced endoscopy? A study assessing the criteria and perceptions of experts with regard to selection of ERCP and EUS trainees.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- Importance of non-technical skills: SACRED in advanced endoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Simulator-based training method in gastrointestinal endoscopy training and currently available simulators.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Review
- Simulation-based mastery learning in gastrointestinal endoscopy training.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022Review
- JAG consensus statements for training and certification in oesophagogastroduodenoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Endoscopy training in the UK pre-COVID-19 environment: a multidisciplinary survey of endoscopy training and the experience of reciprocal feedback.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022Article
- How can gastroenterology training thrive in a post-COVID world?Frontline gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Improving safety and reducing error in endoscopy (ISREE): a survey of UK services.Frontline gastroenterology · 2021Article
- 'Case of the month': a novel way to learn from endoscopy-related patient safety incidents.Frontline gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Development and impact of an endoscopic non-technical skills (ENTS) behavioural marker system.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2021Article
- Multiprofessional in situ simulation is an effective method of identifying latent patient safety threats on the gastroenterology ward.Frontline gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Training in therapeutic endoscopy: meeting present and future challenges.Frontline gastroenterology · 2019Review
- The emerging literature for the triad of health informatics, healthcare quality and safety, and healthcare simulation.Health systems (Basingstoke, England) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient safety incidents occur throughout healthcare and early reports have exposed how deficiencies in 'human factors' have contributed to mortality in endoscopy. Recognising this, in the UK, the Joint Advisory Group for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have implemented a number of initiatives including the 'Improving Safety and Reducing Error in Endoscopy' (ISREE) strategy. Within this, simulation training in human factors and Endoscopic Non-Technical Skills (ENTS) is being developed. Across healthcare, simulation training has been shown to improve team skills and patient outcomes. Although the literature is sparse, integrated and in situ simulation modalities have shown promise in endoscopy. Outcomes demonstrate improved individual and team performance and development of skills that aid clinical practice. Additionally, the use of simulation training to detect latent errors in the working environment is of significant value in reducing error and preventing harm. Implementation of simulation training at local and regional levels can be successfully achieved with collaboration between organisational, educational and clinical leads. Nationally, simulation strategies are a key aspect of the ISREE strategy to improve ENTS training. These may include integration of simulation into current training or development of novel simulation-based curricula. However used, it is evident that simulation training is an important tool in developing safer endoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.