Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31205617›Full record

ArticleJamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa)2019

Vulnerability of growing cities to solid waste-related environmental hazards: The case of Mthatha, South Africa.

Vuyayo Tsheleza, Simbarashe Ndhleve, Hlekani M Kabiti, Christopher M Musampa, Motebang D V Nakin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Illegal Solid-Waste Dumping in a Low-Income Neighbourhood in South Africa: Prevalence and Perceptions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. Waste Disposal Practices in Low-Income Settlements of South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vuyayo TshelezaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2788-3371
Simbarashe NdhleveRisk and Vulnerability Science Centre, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0428-4824
Hlekani M KabitiRisk and Vulnerability Science Centre, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1919-5824
Christopher M MusampaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2304-9152
Motebang D V NakinRisk and Vulnerability Science Centre, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6382-3165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising prevalence of the failure of fast-growing cities' waste authorities to account for solid waste service function and provide effective solid waste systems poses serious environmental hazards and health risks. Household solid waste mismanagement in Mthatha, a fast-growing city in South Africa with a rapid population increase, is emerging as a major environmental hazard. An effective solid waste audit system could reduce the extent of this problem. This study aimed at categorising and quantifying household solid waste generation and determining the drivers of waste generation and mismanagement that have the potential to increase risk and/or vulnerability to household solid waste-related environmental hazards. Stratified random sampling was used to select 248 sample households and to categorise them according to upgraded high-density informal residential settlements (64), high-density formal residential settlements (62), middle-density residential settlements (61) and low-density residential settlements (61). The results revealed that the waste generation rate increased one moves from informal settlements (1.84 bags of waste per household per week) to low-density, low socio-economic statuses (2.26 bags), middle-density settlements (2.39 bags) and low-density residential settlements (2.84 bags). Food waste was the most commonly generated type of waste for more than 50% of the respondents. Approximately 89% of the most common types of waste reported across all settlements had the potential to be recycled, reused or composted. Only four factors emerged as significant determinants ( KEYWORDS: household waste generation; socio-economic drivers; residential density; refuse removal; waste types.

Identifiers

PMID31205617
PMCPMC6556932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.