Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31205611›Full record

ArticleJamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa)2019

Measuring social vulnerability to natural hazards at the district level in Botswana.

Kakanyo F Dintwa, Gobopamang Letamo, Kannan Navaneetham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kakanyo F DintwaEnvironment Statistics Unit, Statistics Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6596-4586
Gobopamang LetamoDepartment of Population Studies, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7256-4700
Kannan NavaneethamDepartment of Population Studies, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5847-4669

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social vulnerability to natural hazards has become a topical issue in the face of climate change. For disaster risk reduction strategies to be effective, prior assessments of social vulnerability have to be undertaken. This study applies the household social vulnerability methodology to measure social vulnerability to natural hazards in Botswana. A total of 11 indicators were used to develop the District Social Vulnerability Index (DSVI). Literature informed the selection of indicators constituting the model. The principal component analysis (PCA) method was used to calculate indicators' weights. The results of this study reveal that social vulnerability is mainly driven by size of household, disability, level of education, age, people receiving social security, employment status, households status and levels of poverty, in that order. The spatial distribution of DSVI scores shows that Ngamiland West, Kweneng West and Central Tutume are highly socially vulnerable. A correlation analysis was run between DSVI scores and the number of households affected by floods, showing a positive linear correlation. The government, non-governmental organisations and the private sector should appreciate that social vulnerability is differentiated, and intervention programmes should take cognisance of this.

Indexed as

BotswanaDistrict Social Vulnerabilitynatural hazardsplace vulnerabilityprincipal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID31205611
PMCPMC6556939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.