Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31205510›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2019

Real-world comparative effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine

Elena Gabriela Chiorean, Winson Y Cheung, Guido Giordano, George Kim, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Clinical application and drug resistance mechanism of gemcitabine.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinical outcomes of first line FOLFIRINOXJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Elena Gabriela ChioreanFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, 825 Eastlake Ave East, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Winson Y CheungAlberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.
Guido GiordanoIRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
George Kim21st Century Oncology, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Salah-Eddin Al-BatranInstitute of Clinical Cancer Research, Krankenhaus Nordwest, University Cancer Center, Frankfurt, Germany.
21st Century Oncology (United States) · USAlberta Health Services · CAFred Hutch Cancer Center · USIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo clinical trial has directly compared nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (nab-P/G) with FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin/irinotecan) in metastatic or advanced pancreatic cancer (mPC or aPC). We conducted a systematic review of real-world studies comparing these regimens in the first-line setting.

methods

resultsOf 818 records initially identified, 35 were duplicates and 749 did not meet the eligibility criteria, mostly because they were either not comparative (

conclusionsAlthough FOLFIRINOX was associated with slightly longer median OS in more studies, the differences, when available, were not statistically significant. Therefore, a randomized, controlled trial is warranted. Toxicity profile differences represent key considerations for treatment decisions.

Indexed as

FOLFIRINOXnab-paclitaxelpancreatic cancerreal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID31205510
PMCPMC6535755
OpenAlexW2945349403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.