ArticleJournal of tropical medicine2019
Acute Severe Anaphylaxis in Nepali Patients with Neurotoxic Snakebite Envenoming Treated with the VINS Polyvalent Antivenom.
Article in Journal of tropical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01284855 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial of Two Dose Regimens of VINS Polyvalent Antivenom), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial of Two Dose Regimens of VINS Polyvalent Antivenom (ATC J06AA03) for the Treatment of Snake Bites With Neurotoxic Envenoming in Nepal
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes in intervention research on snakebite envenomation: a systematic review.F1000Research · 2022Pooled it
- Enhancing Venom Lethality: The Incompatibility ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2025Article
- A Nationwide Study on the Risks of Complications and Healthcare Costs of Snakebite Envenomation in Taiwan.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024Article
- Management of snake bite during third trimester of pregnancy with coagulopathy and delivery of a live baby in resource-limited setting in Nepal: a case report.Oxford medical case reports · 2022Article
- An artificial intelligence model to identify snakes from across the world: Opportunities and challenges for global health and herpetology.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2022Article
- Managing snakebite.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Review
- Hydrocortisone for Preventing Adverse Drug Reactions to Snake Antivenom: A Meta-Analysis.Emergency medicine international · 2022Article
- Clinical management of snakebite envenoming: Future perspectives.Toxicon: X · 2021Article
- Development of a Treatment Protocol for Cobra (Toxins · 2020Article
- Interventions for the management of snakebite envenoming: An overview of systematic reviews.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020Review
- Case Report: Management of Pit Viper Envenoming without Antivenom: A Case Series.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020Article
- A clinical dilemma in an unconscious patient.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnosing and treating acute severe and recurrent antivenom-related anaphylaxis (ARA) is challenging and reported experience is limited. Herein, we describe our experience of severe ARA in patients with neurotoxic snakebite envenoming in Nepal. Patients were enrolled in a randomised, double-blind trial of high vs. low dose antivenom, given by intravenous (IV) push, followed by infusion. Training in ARA management emphasised stopping antivenom and giving intramuscular (IM) adrenaline, IV hydrocortisone, and IV chlorphenamine at the first sign/s of ARA. Later, IV adrenaline infusion (IVAI) was introduced for patients with antecedent ARA requiring additional antivenom infusions. Preantivenom subcutaneous adrenaline (SCAd) was introduced in the second study year (2012). Of 155 envenomed patients who received ≥ 1 antivenom dose, 13 (8.4%), three children (aged 5-11 years) and 10 adults (18-52 years), developed clinical features consistent with severe ARA, including six with overlapping signs of severe envenoming. Four and nine patients received low and high dose antivenom, respectively, and six had received SCAd. Principal signs of severe ARA were dyspnoea alone (n=5 patients), dyspnoea with wheezing (n=3), hypotension (n=3), shock (n=3), restlessness (n=3), respiratory/cardiorespiratory arrest (n=7), and early (n=1) and late laryngeal oedema (n=1); rash was associated with severe ARA in 10 patients. Four patients were given IVAI. Of the 8 (5.1%) deaths, three occurred in transit to hospital. Severe ARA was common and recurrent and had overlapping signs with severe neurotoxic envenoming. Optimising the management of ARA at different healthy system levels needs more research. This trial is registered with NCT01284855.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.