Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31205466›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2019

Magnetically Guided Capsule Endoscopy in Pediatric Patients with Abdominal Pain.

Mingping Xie, Yuting Qian, Shidan Cheng, Lifu Wang, Ruizhe Shen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05522101 (Mini-sized Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy vs. Normal-sized CE for Detection of Small Bowel in Children Under the Age of 10 Years:A Prospective,Multi-center,Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05522101 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Mini-sized Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy vs. Normal-sized CE for Detection of Small Bowel in Children Under the Age of 10 Years:A Prospective,Multi-center,Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChanghai HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled158ConditionsSmall Bowel DiseaseArmsMini-sized MCE, Normal-sized MCE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mingping XieDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1475-1484
Yuting QianDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2342-4001
Shidan ChengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Lifu WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5172-9932
Ruizhe ShenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7491-3003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsMagnetically guided capsule endoscopy (MGCE) offers a noninvasive method of evaluating both the gastric cavity and small intestine; however, few studies have evaluated MGCE in pediatric patients. We investigated the diagnostic efficacy of MGCE in pediatric patients with abdominal pain. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe enrolled 48 patients with abdominal pain aged 6-18 years. All patients underwent MGCE to evaluate the gastric cavity and small intestine.

resultsThe cleanliness of the gastric cardia, fundus, body, angle, antrum, and pylorus was assessed satisfactorily in 100%, 85.4%, 89.6%, 100%, 97.9%, and 100% of patients, respectively. The subjective percentage visualization of the gastric cardia, fundus, body, angle, antrum, and pylorus was 84.8%, 83.8%, 88.5%, 87.7%, 95.2%, and 99.6%, respectively. Eighteen (37.5%) patients had 19 gastrointestinal tract lesions: one esophageal, three in the gastric cavity, and 15 in the small intestine. No adverse events occurred during follow-up.

conclusionsMGCE is safe, convenient, and tolerable for evaluating the gastric cavity and small intestine in pediatric patients. MGCE can effectively diagnose pediatric patients with abdominal pain.

Identifiers

PMID31205466
PMCPMC6530101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.