Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31204699›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetics2019

Whole-genome resequencing reveals genetic indels of feathered-leg traits in domestic chickens.

Shaohua Yang, Zhaoyuan Shi, Xiaoqian Ou, Guoqing Liu

Abstract read
PubMed
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Novel 65-bp Indel in theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shaohua YangCollege of Food Science and Bioengineering, Hefei University of Technology, 193 Tunxi Road, Hefei 230009, Anhui, People's Republic of China. 13675512000@163.com.
Zhaoyuan Shi
Xiaoqian Ou
Guoqing Liu
Hefei University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-genome resequencing provides the opportunity to explore the genomic variations and pave way for further functional assays to map the economical trait loci. In this study, we sequenced the genomes of mixed chicken samples from a full-sib family, with feathered and unfeathered legs at an average effective depth of 4.43×, using Illumina Hiseq 2000 instruments. Over 2.1 million nonredundant short indels (1-71 bp) were obtained. Among them, 16,375 common indels that were polymorphic between the comparison groups were revealed for further analysis. The majority of the common differential indels (76.52%) were novel. Follow-up validation assays confirmed that 80% randomly selected indels represented true variations. The indels were annotated based on the chicken genome sequence assembly. As a result, 16,375 indels were found to be located within 2756 annotated genes, with only 33 (0.202%) located in exons. By integrated analysis of the 2756 genes with gene function and known quantitative trait loci, we identified a total of 24 promising candidate genes potentially affecting feathered-leg trait, i.e.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesGenomeGenomicsINDEL MutationQuantitative Trait, HeritableWhole Genome SequencingAnimalsChickensComputational BiologyGenotypeMolecular Sequence AnnotationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID31204699
OpenAlexW2943963593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.