Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31204610›Full record

Trial reportWestern journal of nursing research2020

Vicarious Experience to Affect Physical Activity in Women: A Randomized Control Trial.

Sheri A Rowland, Marlene Z Cohen, Carol H Pullen, Paula S Schulz, Kris E Berg, Kevin A Kupzyk, Bunny J Pozehl, Bernice C Yates

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Western journal of nursing research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Physical activity partners for women with cardiovascular disease risk: Proof-of-concept trial with daily assessment.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sheri A RowlandUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8967-4161
Marlene Z CohenUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8584-6982
Carol H PullenUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
Paula S SchulzUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, USA.
Kris E BergUniversity of Nebraska-Omaha, USA.
Kevin A KupzykUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
Bunny J PozehlUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
Bernice C YatesUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.

Funding

Peer Intervention to Increase Physical Activity Among Working WomenF31NR016174 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROWLAND, SHERI · 2016 to 2017
$43k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR016174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People compare themselves to others for self-evaluation, practical information, and motivation for healthy behaviors. The effect of active peer models on comparative thinking is unknown. The purpose of this 12-week, randomized, two-group pilot study was to evaluate the effect of a workplace peer modeling intervention on self-efficacy, motivation, and comparative thinking. The attention control group (ACG;

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth BehaviorMotivationPeer GroupSelf EfficacyAdultFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsWorkplacepeer modelingphysical activitysocial comparisonvicarious experienceworkplace

Identifiers

PMID31204610
PMCPMC9179930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.