Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31204434›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2019

General practitioners' involvement during survivorship care of colon cancer in the Netherlands: primary health care utilization during survivorship care of colon cancer, a prospective multicentre cohort study.

Laura A M Duineveld, Hanneke Molthof, Thijs Wieldraaijer, Anthony W H van de Ven, Wim B Busschers, Henk C P M van Weert, Jan Wind

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Survivorship care for cancer patients in primary versus secondary care: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura A M DuineveldDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Hanneke MolthofDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Thijs WieldraaijerDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Anthony W H van de VenDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wim B BusschersDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Henk C P M van WeertDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Jan WindDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary health care use increases when cancer is diagnosed. This increase continues after cancer treatment. More generalist care is suggested to improve survivorship care. It is unknown to what extent cancer-related symptoms are currently presented in primary care in this survivorship phase.

objectiveTo analyse primary health care utilization of colon cancer patients during and after treatment with curative intent.

methodsIn a prospective multicentre cohort study among patients with curatively treated colon cancer, we describe the primary health care utilization during the first 5 years of follow-up. Data were collected at general practitioner (GP) practices during 6 months.

resultsOf 183 included participants, 153 (84%) consulted their GP resulting in 606 contacts (mean 3.3, standard deviation 3.01) with on average 0.9 contact for colon-cancer-related (CCR) problems in the 6-month study period. Median time after surgery at inclusion was 7.6 months (range 0-58). Abdominal pain and chemotherapy-related problems were the most frequently reported CCR reasons. Of the CCR contacts, 83% was managed in primary care. As time after surgery passed, the number of CCR contacts declined in patients without chemotherapy and remained constant in patients who received chemotherapy.

conclusionColon cancer survivors contact their GP frequently also for reasons related to cancer. Currently, a formal role for GPs in survivorship care is lacking, but nevertheless GPs provide a substantial amount of care. Working agreements between primary and secondary care are necessary to formalize the GP's role in order to improve the quality of survivorship care.

Indexed as

Medical OncologyPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelCancer SurvivorsColonic NeoplasmsCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationCancer care/oncologycancer survivorscaregiverscolorectal cancerconsultationprimary care

Identifiers

PMID31204434
PMCPMC7006992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.