ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2020
A comprehensive review and performance evaluation of bioinformatics tools for HLA class I peptide-binding prediction.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
94 citing papers in PubMed, 178 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward Precision Vaccinology for Mpox: Rational Antigen Design, Next-Generation Platforms, and Immune Correlates of Protection.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Review
- Cancer vaccines: comprehensive review.BJS open · 2026Review
- AI-driven genotype-phenotype modeling: a framework integrating multi-modal single-cell genomics and reverse vaccinology forFrontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- STRUMP-I: Structure-Based Machine Learning Approach to pMHC-I Binding Prediction Using Force Field Energy Features.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- A Bibliometric Analysis on Multi-epitope Vaccine Development Against SARS-CoV-2: Current Status, Development, and Future Directions.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Review
- From thresholds to trajectories: a perspective on reframing alloimmune risk for computational modeling in solid organ transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- B Cells Can Trigger the T-Cell-Mediated Autoimmune Response Against Melanocytes in Psoriasis.Cells · 2025Article
- T-Cell Responses and T-Cell-Based Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Current medical science · 2025Review
- Development of iPSC-derived T cells targeting EGFR neoantigens in non-small cell lung cancer.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- STRUMP-I: Structure-based machine learning approach to pMHC-I binding prediction using force field energy features.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Identification of T-Cell Epitopes and Vaccine Development for African Swine Fever Virus.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Computation strategies and clinical applications in neoantigen discovery towards precision cancer immunotherapy.Biomarker research · 2025Review
- Computational methods and data resources for predicting tumor neoantigens.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Population-level toggling of T cell immune escape at human leukocyte antigen anchor residues in SARS-CoV-2 Spike proteins, in an ethnically diverse population region.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Toward understanding biomolecular materials comprising intrinsically disordered proteinsMolecular systems design & engineering · 2025Review
- Advances in Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Their Obstacles, and Prospects Toward Tumor Immunotherapy.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Review
- iMFP-LG: Identify Novel Multi-functional Peptides Using Protein Language Models and Graph-based Deep Learning.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Review
- Machine learning application to predict binding affinity between peptide containing non-canonical amino acids and HLA-A0201.PloS one · 2025Article
- Advances in neoantigen-based immunotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I) molecules are encoded by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I loci in humans. The binding and interaction between HLA-I molecules and intracellular peptides derived from a variety of proteolytic mechanisms play a crucial role in subsequent T-cell recognition of target cells and the specificity of the immune response. In this context, tools that predict the likelihood for a peptide to bind to specific HLA class I allotypes are important for selecting the most promising antigenic targets for immunotherapy. In this article, we comprehensively review a variety of currently available tools for predicting the binding of peptides to a selection of HLA-I allomorphs. Specifically, we compare their calculation methods for the prediction score, employed algorithms, evaluation strategies and software functionalities. In addition, we have evaluated the prediction performance of the reviewed tools based on an independent validation data set, containing 21 101 experimentally verified ligands across 19 HLA-I allotypes. The benchmarking results show that MixMHCpred 2.0.1 achieves the best performance for predicting peptides binding to most of the HLA-I allomorphs studied, while NetMHCpan 4.0 and NetMHCcons 1.1 outperform the other machine learning-based and consensus-based tools, respectively. Importantly, it should be noted that a peptide predicted with a higher binding score for a specific HLA allotype does not necessarily imply it will be immunogenic. That said, peptide-binding predictors are still very useful in that they can help to significantly reduce the large number of epitope candidates that need to be experimentally verified. Several other factors, including susceptibility to proteasome cleavage, peptide transport into the endoplasmic reticulum and T-cell receptor repertoire, also contribute to the immunogenicity of peptide antigens, and some of them can be considered by some predictors. Therefore, integrating features derived from these additional factors together with HLA-binding properties by using machine-learning algorithms may increase the prediction accuracy of immunogenic peptides. As such, we anticipate that this review and benchmarking survey will assist researchers in selecting appropriate prediction tools that best suit their purposes and provide useful guidelines for the development of improved antigen predictors in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.