Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31203552›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019

Hydrothermal carbonisation of peat-based spent sorbents loaded with metal(loid)s.

Alfreda Kasiuliene, Ivan Carabante, Prosun Bhattacharya, Jurate Kumpiene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alfreda KasiulieneDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, SE-97187, Lulea, Sweden. alfreda.kasiuliene@ltu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5375-8825
Ivan CarabanteDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, SE-97187, Lulea, Sweden.
Prosun BhattacharyaDepartment of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 76, SE-100 44, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jurate KumpieneDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, SE-97187, Lulea, Sweden.

Funding

Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 942-2015-873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC) is a wet and relatively low-temperature process where, under autogenous pressures, biomass undergoes a chain of reactions leading to the defragmentation of organic matter. As well as its other uses (e.g. for producing low-cost carbon-based nano-compounds), HTC is utilised for the treatment of wet wastes, such as manure and biosludge. This study aimed to determine if hydrothermal carbonisation is a feasible treatment method for spent sorbents that are highly enriched with arsenic, chromium, copper, and zinc. The chemical properties of hydrochar and process liquid were evaluated after HTC treatment, where peat-based spent sorbents were carbonised at 230 °C for 3 h. Analysis of Fourier transform-infrared spectra revealed that during HTC, the oxygenated bonds of ethers, esters, and carboxylic groups were cleaved, and low-molecular-weight organic fragments were dissolved in the process liquid. A large fraction of arsenic (up to 62%), copper (up to 25%), and zinc (up to 36%) were transferred from the solids into the process water. Leaching of these elements from the hydrochars increased significantly in comparison with the spent sorbents.

Indexed as

BiomassCarbonManureMetalloidsMetalsSoilTemperatureCarbonManureMetalloidsMetalsSoilAdsorptionHTCIron-peatMetalsPost-sorption managementThermal treatment

Identifiers

PMID31203552
PMCPMC6667402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.