Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31203402›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Short-interval intracortical inhibition to the biceps brachii is present during arm cycling but is not different than a position- and intensity-matched tonic contraction.

L R Alcock, A J Spence, E J Lockyer, D C Button, Kevin E Power

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

L R AlcockHuman Neurophysiology Lab, School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Physical Education Building, Room PE 2022A, St. John's, NL, A1C 5S7, Canada.
A J SpenceHuman Neurophysiology Lab, School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Physical Education Building, Room PE 2022A, St. John's, NL, A1C 5S7, Canada.
E J LockyerHuman Neurophysiology Lab, School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Physical Education Building, Room PE 2022A, St. John's, NL, A1C 5S7, Canada.
D C ButtonHuman Neurophysiology Lab, School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Physical Education Building, Room PE 2022A, St. John's, NL, A1C 5S7, Canada.
Kevin E PowerHuman Neurophysiology Lab, School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Physical Education Building, Room PE 2022A, St. John's, NL, A1C 5S7, Canada. kevin.power@mun.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2257-3881

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council 2016-03646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have previously shown that supraspinal excitability is higher during arm cycling than a position- and intensity-matched tonic contraction. The present study sought to determine if short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) was present during arm cycling and if so, if the amount of SICI was different from an intensity-matched tonic contraction. SICI was assessed using conditioning stimuli (CS) of 70 and 90% of active motor threshold (AMT) and a test stimulus (TS) of 120% AMT at an interstimulus interval (ISI) of 2.5 ms. SICI was elicited in all participants; on average (i.e., cycling and tonic contraction grouped) test MEP amplitudes were reduced by 64.2% (p < 0.001) and 62.8% (p = 0.001) following conditioning stimuli of 70% and 90% AMT, respectively. There was no significant difference in extent of SICI between tasks (p = 0.360). These data represent the novel finding that SICI is present during arm cycling, a motor output partially mediated by spinal interneuronal networks. The amount of SICI, however, was not different from that during a position- and intensity-matched tonic contraction, suggesting that SICI is not likely a cortical mechanism contributing to higher supraspinal excitability during arm cycling compared to tonic contraction.

Indexed as

AdultArmCerebral CortexElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMotor ActivityMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalNeural InhibitionTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultArm crankingCorticalPaired-pulse TMSPedalingTask-dependent

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.