Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31203395›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2020

Ultrasound non-invasive intracranial pressure assessment in paediatric neurocritical care: a pilot study.

Chiara Robba, Danilo Cardim, Marek Czosnyka, Francisco Abecasis, Stefano Pezzato, Silvia Buratti, Andrea Moscatelli, Cristina Sortica, Fabrizio Racca, Paolo Pelosi and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of monitoring critical ill children with traumatic brain injury.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Optic nerve sheath diameter and pulsatility index for the diagnosis and follow-up in pediatric traumatic brain injury: a prospective observational cohort study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Observational
  9. Optic Nerve Ultrasound Evaluation in Children: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Chiara RobbaNeurosciences Critical Care Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. kiarobba@gmail.com.
Danilo CardimBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Marek CzosnykaBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Francisco AbecasisPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Stefano PezzatoNeonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Istuto G. Gaslini Children's Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Silvia BurattiNeonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Istuto G. Gaslini Children's Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Andrea MoscatelliNeonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Istuto G. Gaslini Children's Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Cristina SorticaNeonatal Unit, The Rosie Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Fabrizio RaccaPediatric Critical Care, S Antonio Cesare Arrigo Biagio, Alessandria, Italy.
Paolo PelosiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, S. Policlinico Martino Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Frank RasuloDepartment of Intensive Care, Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Istituto Giannina Gaslini · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Lisbon · PTWarsaw University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe assessment of intracranial pressure (ICP) is essential in the management of neurocritical care paediatric patients. The gold standard for invasive ICP is an intraventricular catheter or intraparenchymal microsensor but is invasive and carries some risks. Therefore, a non-invasive method for measuring ICP (nICP) would be desirable especially in the paediatric population. The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between ICP and different ultrasound-based methods in neurocritical care paediatric patients.

methodsChildren aged < 16 years with indication for invasive ICP monitoring were prospectively enrolled. The following non-invasive methods were compared with the invasive gold standard: optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound (ONSD)-derived nICP (nICP

resultsWe analysed 107 measurements from 10 paediatric patients. Results from linear regression demonstrated that, among the nICP methods, ONSD has the best correlation with ICP (r = 0.852 (p < 0.0001)). Results from receiving operator curve analysis demonstrated that using a threshold of 15 mmHg, ONSD has and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI = 0.892-0.989), with best threshold at 3.85 mm (sensitivity = 0.811; specificity = 0.939).

conclusionsOur preliminary results suggested that ONSD ultrasonography presents the best accuracy to assess ICP among the methods studied. Given its non-invasiveness, repeatability and safety, this technique has the potential of representing a valid option as non-invasive tool to assess the risk of intracranial hypertension in the paediatric population.

Indexed as

Intracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureChildHumansOptic NervePilot ProjectsUltrasonographyUltrasonography, Doppler, TranscranialOptic nerve sheath diameterPaediatricPulsatility indexTranscranial Doppler

Identifiers

PMID31203395
OpenAlexW2952713108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.