Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31203250›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Can we validate a clinical score to predict the risk of severe infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus? A longitudinal retrospective study in a British Cohort.

Beatriz Tejera Segura, Iñigo Rua-Figueroa, Jose Maria Pego-Reigosa, Victor Del Campo, Chris Wincup, David Isenberg, Anisur Rahman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Immunosuppressive Agents and Infectious Risk in Transplantation: Managing the "Net State of Immunosuppression".Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Beatriz Tejera SeguraCentre for Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, UK.
Iñigo Rua-FigueroaRheumatology Department, Doctor Negrín University Hospital of Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Jose Maria Pego-ReigosaRheumatology Department, University Hospital Vigo, IRIDIS Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur (IISGS), Vigo, Spain.
Victor Del CampoPreventive Medicine and Epidemiology Department, University Hospital Vigo, IRIDIS Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur (IISGS), Vigo, Spain.
Chris WincupCentre for Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, UK.
David IsenbergCentre for Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9514-2455
Anisur RahmanCentre for Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, UK.
University College London · GBHospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín · ES

Funding

Versus Arthritis 21992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSevere infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Our primary objective was to use data from a large Spanish cohort to develop a risk score for severe infection in SLE, the SLE Severe Infection Score (SLESIS) and to validate SLESIS in a separate cohort of 699 British patients. DESIGN AND

settingRetrospective longitudinal study in a specialist tertiary care clinic in London, UK.

participantsPatients fulfilling international classification criteria for SLE (n=209). This included 98 patients who had suffered severe infections (defined as infection leading to hospitalisation and/or death) and 111 randomly selected patients who had never suffered severe infections. OUTCOMES: We retrospectively calculated SLESIS at diagnosis for all 209 patients. For the infection cases we also calculated SLESIS just prior to infection and compared it to SLESIS in 98 controls matched for disease duration. We carried out receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis to quantify predictive value of SLESIS for severe infection.

resultsMedian SLESIS (IQR) at diagnosis was higher in the infection group than in the control group (4.27 (3.18) vs 2.55 (3.79), p=0.0008). Median SLESIS prior to infection was higher than at diagnosis (6.64 vs 4.27, p<0.001). In ROC analysis, predictive value of SLESIS just before the infection (area under the curve (AUC)=0.79) was higher than that of SLESIS at diagnosis (AUC=0.63).

conclusionsWe validated the association of SLESIS with severe infection in an independent cohort. Calculation of SLESIS at each clinic visit may help in management of infection risk in patients with SLE. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

InfectionsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicAdultFemaleHospitalizationHumansLondonLongitudinal StudiesMalePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness Indexrisk scoresevere infectionsystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID31203250
PMCPMC6589043
OpenAlexW2952693445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.