ArticleBMJ open2019
Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Teamwork and implementation of innovations in healthcare and human service settings: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2024Pooled it
- Experiences of perioperative nurses with robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review of qualitative studies.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Work-system interventions in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review exploring the gap between challenges and solutions.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Pooled it
- Development of a predictive score for prolonged pelvic operation time in robot-assisted low anterior resection: a single-center, retrospective study in Japan.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- A narrative review and proposed framework for robotic surgical training in Urology for Southeast Asia (SEA): a qualitative survey and expert panel recommendations.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Human-robot collaboration in surgery at the nexus of knowledge, agency, and ownership.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Experiences of robotic surgery nurses regarding technostress: a qualitative study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Robotic Surgery from a Gynaecological Oncology Perspective: A Global Gynaecological Oncology Surgical Outcomes Collaborative Led Study (GO SOAR3).Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- New colleague or gimmick hurdle? A user-centric scoping review of the barriers and facilitators of robots in hospitals.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- From Bench to Bedside, to Hospital: A New Role for the International Neurourology Journal.International neurourology journal · 2024Article
- Perceptions of theatre team members to robotic assisted surgery and the aid of technology in colorectal surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- How experienced robotic nurses adapt to the Hugo™ RAS system.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- What do nurses experience in communication when assisting in robotic surgery: an integrative literature review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Robots for surgeons? Surgeons for robots? Exploring the acceptance of robotic surgery in the light of attitudes and trust in robots.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and oncological results between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer by multiple surgeon implementation: a propensity score-matched analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Barriers to safety and efficiency in robotic surgery docking.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Multiple perceptions of robotic-assisted surgery among surgeons and patients: a cross-sectional study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2021Article
- Article
- Roboethics principles and policies in Europe and North America.SN applied sciences · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo capture stakeholders' theories concerning how and in what contexts robot-assisted surgery becomes integrated into routine practice.
designA literature review provided tentative theories that were revised through a realist interview study. Literature-based theories were presented to the interviewees, who were asked to describe to what extent and in what ways those theories reflected their experience. Analysis focused on identifying mechanisms through which robot-assisted surgery becomes integrated into practice and contexts in which those mechanisms are triggered.
settingNine hospitals in England where robot-assisted surgery is used for colorectal operations.
participantsForty-four theatre staff with experience of robot-assisted colorectal surgery, including surgeons, surgical trainees, theatre nurses, operating department practitioners and anaesthetists.
resultsInterviewees emphasised the importance of support from hospital management, team leaders and surgical colleagues. Training together as a team was seen as beneficial, increasing trust in each other's knowledge and supporting team bonding, in turn leading to improved teamwork. When first introducing robot-assisted surgery, it is beneficial to have a handpicked dedicated robotic team who are able to quickly gain experience and confidence. A suitably sized operating theatre can reduce operation duration and the risk of de-sterilisation. Motivation among team members to persist with robot-assisted surgery can be achieved without involvement in the initial decision to purchase a robot, but training that enables team members to feel confident as they take on the new tasks is essential.
conclusionsWe captured accounts of how robot-assisted surgery has been introduced into a range of hospitals. Using a realist approach, we were also able to capture perceptions of the factors that support and constrain the integration of robot-assisted surgery into routine practice. We have translated these into recommendations that can inform future implementations of robot-assisted surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.