ArticleBMJ open2019
Trends in the receipt of medicines information among Finnish adults in 1999-2014: a nationwide repeated cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Receipt of Medicines Information From the Internet and Other Information Sources Among Adult Medicine Users in Developed Economies, 2010-2025: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Identifying patient data that should be available in community pharmacies for statutory dispensing and providing clinical pharmacy services: A Delphi study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- From Hospital to Home: Patient Experiences With Medication Counselling for Colorectal Cancer.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- Fair Balance of Prescription Drug Information on Legitimate and Illegitimate Online Pharmacy Websites.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Internet Use for Obtaining Medicine Information: Cross-sectional Survey.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Self-reported medication information needs among medication users in a general population aged 40 years and above - the Tromsø study.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Are there differences in the treatment information received to support guided self-management between asthma and allergy patients?: A community pharmacy survey in Finland.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2021Article
- Patients' perceptions of medicines information received at hospital discharge in Norway: a qualitative interview study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Article
- Article
- Awareness of the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: A cross-sectional study.Medicine internationalArticle
- Policy and vision for community pharmacies in Finland: A roadmap towards enhanced integration and reduced costs.Pharmacy practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to examine long-term trends in the receipt of medicines information (MI) among adult medicine users from 1999 to 2014.
designRepeated cross-sectional postal survey from the years 1999, 2002, 2005 and 2008-2014.
settingEach study year, a new nationally representative sample of 5000 Finns aged 15-64 years was drawn from the Population Register Centre of Finland.
participantsThe range of annual respondents varied from 2545 to 3371 and response rates from 53% to 67%. Of the total responses (n=29 465), 64% were from medicine users (n=18 862, ranging by year from 58% to 68%). OUTCOME MEASURES: Receipt of information on medicines in use within 12 months prior to the survey from a given list of consumer MI sources available in Finland.
resultsPhysicians, community pharmacists and package leaflets were the most common MI sources throughout the study period. Receipt of MI increased most from the Internet (from 1% in 1999 to 16% in 2014), while decreased most from physicians (62% to 47%) and package leaflets (44% to 34%), and remained stable from community pharmacists (46% to 45%) and nurses (14% to 14%). In 1999, of the medicine users 4% did not report receipt of MI from any of the sources listed in the survey, while this proportion had remarkably increased to 28% in 2014.
conclusionsHealthcare professionals and package leaflets had still a dominating importance in 2014 despite the growing number of MI sources over time, but still a minority of adult medicine users reported receiving MI via the Internet in 2014. Worrying is that the proportion of adult medicine users who did not receive MI from any of the sources became seven fold during the study period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.