ArticleJournal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR2019
Angiographic Atlas of the Visceral Vascular Anatomy in Translational Rat Models.
Article in Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extra-hepatic arterial branching pattern in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).Anatomical science international · 2025Article
- Jugular Venous Catheterization-Enhanced CT Angiography for In Vivo 3D Visualization of Cardiopulmonary Vasculature in Sprague-Dawley Rats.Pulmonary circulation · 2025Article
- Bilateral Subcutaneous Rat Tumor Model Perfused by the Iliolumbar Artery: A Simplified and Versatile Platform for Transarterial Therapy Studies.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2025Article
- Regional Heterogeneity in Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Permeability and Mesenteric Perfusion After Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- Woodchuck Hepatic Anatomy and Vascular Alterations Due to Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Angiographic Atlas of the Abdomen and Pelvis.Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo characterize angiographic and cross-sectional imaging anatomy of the rat visceral vasculature in 2 translational models. MATERIALS AND
methodsAnimal studies were conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines and approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees. Retrospective review of digital subtraction arteriography was performed in 65 Wistar and 50 Sprague-Dawley male rats through a left common carotid artery or right common femoral artery approach. MR imaging of the abdomen was performed on the rats to correlate imaging modalities.
resultsAortography was performed in 3 locations, including cranial to the celiac artery, cranial to the renal arteries, and cranial to the caudal (inferior) mesenteric artery, enabling characterization of the visceral branch arteries in all 65 Wistar rats. Selective arteriography of first-, second-, and third-order branch vessels of the aorta was performed allowing characterization of normal and variant anatomy. Dedicated selective arteriography was performed of the celiac artery in 65 Wistar and 10 Sprague-Dawley rats, of the common hepatic artery in 65 Wistar and 50 Sprague-Dawley rats, and of the cranial mesenteric artery in 43 Wistar rats. MR imaging enabled correlation with the lobar and portal venous anatomy.
conclusionsAnalysis of arteriography and MR imaging in these rat models will provide translational researchers with anatomic details needed to develop new endovascular protocols for small animal research in interventional radiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.