Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31202213›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2020

Aging mice show impaired memory updating in the novel OUL updating paradigm.

Janine L Kwapis, Yasaman Alaghband, Ashley A Keiser, Tri N Dong, Christina M Michael, Diane Rhee, Guanhua Shu, Richard T Dang, Dina P Matheos, Marcelo A Wood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Molecular Mechanisms of Reconsolidation-Dependent Memory Updating.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Janine L KwapisDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. jlk855@psu.edu.
Yasaman AlaghbandDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Ashley A KeiserDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Tri N DongDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Christina M MichaelDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Diane RheeDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Guanhua ShuDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Richard T DangDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Dina P MatheosDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Marcelo A WoodDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.

Funding

Training in the Neurobiology of Aging and Alzheimers DiseaseT32AG000096 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI VIVEK SWARUP, Craig E Stark · 1985 to 2026
$9.6M
Behavioral and Epigenetic Mechanisms in Extinction of Cocaine-Induced MemoriesR01DA025922 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI LATTAL, K MATTHEW, WOOD, MARCELO ANDRES · 2008 to 2018
$5.1M
Exercise-induced epigenetic mechanisms underlying neuronal plasticity and cognitionR01AG051807 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COTMAN, CARL WAYNE, WOOD, MARCELO ANDRES · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Role of Neuron-Specific Nucleosome Remodeling in Intellectual DisabilityR01MH101491 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LYNCH, GARY S, WOOD, MARCELO ANDRES · 2013 to 2017
$2.3M
Coordinate gene expression via nucleosome remodeling and chromosomal loopingR01DA036984 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI AKBARIAN, SCHAHRAM, WOOD, MARCELO ANDRES · 2013 to 2016
$1.5M
Role of HDAC3 in repressing memory formation in the aging brainR21AG050787 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI WOOD, MARCELO ANDRES · 2016 to 2017
$425k
Epigenetic regulation of the circadian gene Per1 in age-related memory impairmentsK99AG056596 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI KWAPIS, JANINE LYNN · 2017 to 2018
$201k
Epigenetic repression of synaptic plasticity and memory in the aging brainF32AG052303 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI KWAPIS, JANINE LYNN · 2015 to 2017
$88k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG052303NIA NIH HHS K99 AG056596NIA NIH HHS R01 AG051807NIA NIH HHS R21 AG050787NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000096NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025922NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036984NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memories do not persist in a permanent, static state but instead must be dynamically modified in response to new information. Although new memory formation is typically studied in a laboratory setting, most real-world associations are modifications to existing memories, particularly in the aging, experienced brain. To date, the field has lacked a simple behavioral paradigm that can measure whether original and updated information is remembered in a single test session. To address this gap, we have developed a novel memory updating paradigm, called the Objects in Updated Locations (OUL) task that is capable of assessing memory updating in a non-stressful task that is appropriate for both young and old rodents. We first show that young mice successfully remember both the original memory and the updated information in OUL. Next, we demonstrate that intrahippocampal infusion of the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin disrupts both the updated information and the original memory at test, suggesting that memory updating in OUL engages the original memory. To verify this, we used the Arc CatFISH technique to show that the OUL update session reactivates a largely overlapping set of neurons as the original memory. Finally, using OUL, we show that memory updating is impaired in aging, 18-m.o. mice. Together, these results demonstrate that hippocampal memory updating is impaired with aging and establish that the OUL paradigm is an effective, sensitive method of assessing memory updating in rodents.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsMaleMemoryMemory DisordersMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRecognition, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID31202213
PMCPMC6901557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.