Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31201666›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2019

Diagnostic validity of the use of ICDAS II and DIAGNOdent pen verified by micro-computed tomography for the detection of occlusal caries lesions-an in vitro evaluation.

Elzbieta Luczaj-Cepowicz, Grazyna Marczuk-Kolada, Marta Obidzinska, Jarosław Sidun

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elzbieta Luczaj-CepowiczDepartment of Pedodontics, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona Str. 15a, 15-297, Bialystok, Poland.
Grazyna Marczuk-KoladaDepartment of Pedodontics, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona Str. 15a, 15-297, Bialystok, Poland. grazyna.kolada@umb.edu.pl.
Marta ObidzinskaDepartment of Pedodontics, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona Str. 15a, 15-297, Bialystok, Poland.
Jarosław SidunFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, Bialystok, Poland.

Funding

Uniwersytet Medyczny w Bialymstoku N/ST/MN/16/001/1170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the extent of early carious lesions using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) II and DIAGNOdent pen compared with microCT examination. Forty-eight molars and premolars were qualified for the study. The visual and the DIAGNOdent pen device examinations were carried out by two examiners. The actual extent of the lesions was determined using micro-CT examination. The optimal cutoff test value was determined using the Youden index. For the two methods, inter- and intra-examiner reproducibility was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of these methods were compared using the mid-P McNemar test. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. In terms of the enamel threshold for the ICDAS II scale, insignificantly higher mean evaluated parameters were noticed in comparison with the DIAGNOdent pen device. For the dentin threshold, all the assessed parameters had higher mean values on the ICDAS II scale compared with the DIAGNOdent pen. The optimal cutoff points of the enamel and dentin thresholds are lower than that suggested by the manufacturer. The ICDAS II and the DIAGNOdent pen device were characterized by high inter - and intra-observer reproducibility of the test results. To improve the diagnostic efficiency of the DIAGNOdent pen, modifying the cutoff values recommended by the manufacturers should be considered. After modifying the cutoff values, the combination ICDAS II and DIAGNOdent pen device would be the better choice in order to detect caries on occlusal surfaces.

Indexed as

Dental OcclusionX-Ray MicrotomographyArea Under CurveDental CariesFluorescenceHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityCaries detectionDIAGNOdent penFluorescenceICDAS IIMicroCT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.