Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31201618›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2019

Comparative analysis of in vitro proliferative, migratory and pro-angiogenic potentials of bovine fetal mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow and adipose tissue.

M Jervis, O Huaman, B Cahuascanco, J Bahamonde, J Cortez, J I Arias, C G Torres, O A Peralta

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An Update on Applications of Cattle Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M JervisDepartment of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, 8820808, Santiago, Chile.
O HuamanDepartment of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, 8820808, Santiago, Chile.
B CahuascancoDepartment of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, 8820808, Santiago, Chile.
J BahamondeDepartment of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, 8820808, Santiago, Chile.
J CortezDepartment of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, 8820808, Santiago, Chile.
J I AriasDepartment of Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, 8820808, Santiago, Chile.
C G TorresDepartment of Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, 8820808, Santiago, Chile.
O A PeraltaDepartment of Animal Production Science, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Chile, 8820808, Santiago, Chile. operalta@uchile.cl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2040-4902
University of Chile · CLAustral University of Chile · CLVirginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine · US

Funding

Fondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico ID15I10129Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (CL) 1161251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are found in virtually all tissues, where they self-renew and differentiate into multiple cell types. Cumulative data indicate that MSCs secrete paracrine factors that may play key roles in the treatment of various acute and chronic pathological conditions in diverse animal species including cattle. The aim of the present study was to compare the potentials for proliferation, migration and pro-angiogenesis of bovine fetal BM-MSCs and AT-MSCs under in vitro conditions. Growth curves and population doubling time (PDT) were determined for BM-MSCs and AT-MSCs in order to compare in vitro cell proliferation potentials. The ability of BM-MSCs and AT-MSCs to migrate was evaluated by scratch plate and transwell migration assays. The pro-angiogenic potential of conditioned medium from BM-MSCs and AT-MSCs was compared using an endothelial cell (EC) tubule formation assay. BM-MSCs displayed higher proliferation curves and doubled their populations in fewer days compared to AT-MSCs. No significant differences were detected in the number of migrant cells between BM-MSCs and AT-MSCs; however, a higher migration value was detected for BM-MSCs compared to fibroblasts (FBs), and a higher number of migrant cells were attracted by DMEM supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) compared to stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1). More tubules of ECs were formed after exposure to concentrated conditioned medium from AT-MSCs compared to BM-MSCs, FBs or DMEM controls. Despite common mesodermal origin, BM-MSCs display higher proliferative capacity and lower pro-angiogenic potential compared to AT-MSCs; however, both cell types possess similar migratory ability.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCattleCell MovementCell ProliferationCulture Media, ConditionedIn Vitro TechniquesMesenchymal Stem CellsAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsCulture Media, ConditionedAngiogenesisCell migrationCell proliferationMSCs

Identifiers

PMID31201618
OpenAlexW2952379059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.