ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2019
[Stimulation of fracture healing by growth factors and cell-based technologies].
Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Adjunctive therapies in geriatric ankle fracture patients].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Addition of shock wave therapy to nail dynamization increases the chance of long-bone non-union healing.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone has the special capability to completely regenerate after trauma and to re-establish its original geometry and biomechanical stability corresponding to the pretrauma conditions. Nevertheless, in daily clinical practice impaired fracture healing and nonunions are regular complications as a result of inadequate mechanical stability and/or insufficient biological processes around the fracture region. Since the beginning of the millennium, intensive research on the physiological processes in bone healing as well as the production and clinical administration of growth factors have enabled the possibility to improve the local biological processes during fracture healing by osteoinduction. Although the initial clinical results, particularly of bone morphogenetic proteins, in fracture healing were promising, growth factors did not become established for unrestricted use in the clinical application. Currently, additional growth factors are being investigated with respect to the potential supportive and osteoinductive characteristics for enhancement of fracture healing and possible clinical applications. Furthermore, the development of cell-based technologies is another promising approach to positively stimulate fracture healing. In addition to the gold standard of autologous bone grafting, harvesting of mesenchymal stroma cells by aspiration has gained in importance in recent years. Allogeneic bone cell transplantation procedures and in particular gene therapy are promising new strategies for the treatment of disorders of fracture healing. This review gives an overview of present and future possibilities for modulation of fracture healing by growth factors and cell-based technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.