Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31201322›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Structural balance emerges and explains performance in risky decision-making.

Omid Askarisichani, Jacqueline Ng Lane, Francesco Bullo, Noah E Friedkin, Ambuj K Singh, Brian Uzzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Empirical social triad statistics can be explained with dyadic homophylic interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Computational Social Science and Sociology.Annual review of sociology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Omid AskarisichaniDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8891-2781
Jacqueline Ng LaneHarvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, 02134, USA.
Francesco BulloCenter for Control, Dynamical Systems and Computation, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4785-2118
Noah E FriedkinCenter for Control, Dynamical Systems and Computation, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7826-993X
Ambuj K SinghDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
Brian UzziNorthwestern Institute on Complex Systems, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA. uzzi@kellogg.northwestern.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polarization affects many forms of social organization. A key issue focuses on which affective relationships are prone to change and how their change relates to performance. In this study, we analyze a financial institutional over a two-year period that employed 66 day traders, focusing on links between changes in affective relations and trading performance. Traders' affective relations were inferred from their IMs (>2 million messages) and trading performance was measured from profit and loss statements (>1 million trades). Here, we find that triads of relationships, the building blocks of larger social structures, have a propensity towards affective balance, but one unbalanced configuration resists change. Further, balance is positively related to performance. Traders with balanced networks have the "hot hand", showing streaks of high performance. Research implications focus on how changes in polarization relate to performance and polarized states can depolarize.

Indexed as

CommerceModels, PsychologicalRisk-TakingSocial NetworkingDecision MakingHumansMarkov ChainsText Messaging

Identifiers

PMID31201322
PMCPMC6572859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.