Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31201186›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

An auditory brainstem implant for treatment of unilateral tinnitus: protocol for an interventional pilot study.

Minke J C van den Berge, J M C van Dijk, Jan D M Metzemaekers, Bert Maat, Rolien H Free, Pim van Dijk

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02630589 (Implantation of an Auditory Brainstem Implant for the Treatment of Incapacitating Unilateral Tinnitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02630589 narecruitingnot on this map

Implantation of an Auditory Brainstem Implant for the Treatment of Incapacitating Unilateral Tinnitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2016 to 2028Enrolled10ConditionsTinnitusArmsAuditory brainstem implant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Too Blind to See the Elephant? Why Neuroscientists Ought to Be Interested in Tinnitus.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021
    Review
  3. Clinical and scientific innovations in auditory brainstem implants.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Minke J C van den BergeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J M C van DijkDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0814-5680
Jan D M MetzemaekersDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Bert MaatDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9856-7010
Rolien H FreeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Pim van DijkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTinnitus may have a very severe impact on the quality of life. Unfortunately, for many patients, a satisfactory treatment modality is lacking. The auditory brainstem implant (ABI) was originally indicated for hearing restoration in patients with non-functional cochlear nerves, for example, in neurofibromatosis type II. In analogy to a cochlear implant (CI), it has been demonstrated that an ABI may reduce tinnitus as a beneficial side effect. For tinnitus treatment, an ABI may have an advantage over a CI, as cochlear implantation can harm inner ear structures due to its invasiveness, while an ABI is presumed to not damage anatomical structures. This is the first study to implant an ABI to investigate its effect on intractable tinnitus. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this pilot study, 10 adults having incapacitating unilateral intractable tinnitus and ipsilateral severe hearing loss will have an ABI implanted. The ABI is switched on 6 weeks after implantation, followed by several fitting sessions aimed at finding an optimal stimulation strategy. The primary outcome will be the change in Tinnitus Functioning Index. Secondary outcomes will be tinnitus burden and quality of life (using Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaires), tinnitus characteristics (using Visual Analogue Scale, a tinnitus analysis), safety, audiometric and vestibular function. The end point is set at 1 year after implantation. Follow-up will continue until 5 years after implantation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University Medical Centre Groningen, The Netherlands (METc 2015/479). The trial is registered at www.clinicialtrials.gov and will be updated if amendments are made. Results of this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02630589. TRIAL STATUS: Inclusion of first patient in November 2017. Data collection is in progress. Trial is open for further inclusion. The trial ends at 5 years after inclusion of the last patient.

Indexed as

Auditory Brain Stem ImplantsHearingQuality of LifeHearing Loss, SensorineuralHearing TestsHumansNetherlandsPilot ProjectsPostoperative ComplicationsTinnitusTreatment Outcomeauditory brainstem implantneuromodulationneurotologytinnitus

Identifiers

PMID31201186
PMCPMC6576138
OpenAlexW2949059668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.