Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31201185›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Smoke-free prisons in England: indoor air quality before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free policy.

Leah R Jayes, Rachael L Murray, Magdalena Opazo Breton, Christopher Hill, Elena Ratschen, John Britton

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Qualitative Study of the Implementation and Continued Delivery of Complete and Partial Smoke-Free Policies Across England's Prison Estate.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leah R JayesDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5240-6286
Rachael L MurrayDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Magdalena Opazo BretonDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Christopher HillDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Elena RatschenDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
John BrittonDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKDepartment of HealthMedical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHigh levels of particulate pollution due to secondhand smoke (SHS) have previously been recorded in English prisons. As part of an evaluation to ascertain whether a new comprehensive smoke-free policy introduced in the first four prisons in England was successfully implemented, this study compares indoor air quality on prison wing landing locations three months before and three months after going smoke-free.

designAn indoor air quality monitoring study, comparing SHS levels before and after a comprehensive smoke-free prison policy.

settingThe first four prisons in England to implement a comprehensive smoke-free policy. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MEASURES: We compared concentrations of airborne particulate matter <2.5 microns in diameter (PM₂.₅), as a marker for SHS, on wing landing locations three months before and three months after the smoke-free policy was implemented. Static battery operated aerosol monitors were used to sample concentrations of PM₂.₅ on wing landings.

resultsAfter discarding data from monitors that had been tampered with we were able to analyse paired data across four prisons from 74 locations, across 29 wing landing locations, for an average sampling time of five hours and eight minutes. When comparing samples taken three months before with the paired samples taken three months after policy implementation (paired for prison, day of the week, time of day, wing location and position of monitor), there was a 66% reduction in mean PM₂.₅ concentrations across the four prisons sampled, from 39 to 13 µg/m³ (difference 26 µg/m³, 95% CI 25 to 26 µg/m³).

conclusionPrison smoke-free policies achieve significant improvements in indoor air quality. A national smoke-free policy would therefore be an effective means of protecting prisoners and staff from harm due to SHS exposure in the prison environment.

Indexed as

Smoke-Free PolicyAir Pollution, IndoorEnglandEnvironmental MonitoringHumansParticulate MatterPrisonsTobacco Smoke PollutionParticulate MatterTobacco Smoke Pollutionepidemiologypublic health

Identifiers

PMID31201185
PMCPMC6575713
OpenAlexW2949408449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.