ReviewCritical care (London, England)2019
The continuum of critical care.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and opportunities for implementation of a brief psychological intervention for post-ICU mental distress in the primary care setting - results from a qualitative sub-study of the PICTURE trial.BMC primary care · 2023Trial
- Designing a hybrid surgical ICU to avoid intrahospital transport in selected critically Ill patients: the CUHK-SZ institutional concept.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2026Article
- Impact of early albumin therapy on 28-day survival in ICU patients with septic shock concurrent hypoalbuminemia: a retrospective analysis of combined clinical datasets.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- The on-call intensivist: a pilot in the storm.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Examining concepts related to critical illness and the management of critically ill patients: a protocol for a scoping review.NIHR open research · 2026Article
- A Reflection on Current Definitions of Critical Care and Critical Illness-A Narrative Review of the Literature.Nursing in critical care · 2026Review
- Observational
- Feeling Trapped and Optimistic: Current Rather than Prospective Medical Conditions Dominate Self-Reported Emotions and Appraisals in Mechanically Ventilated Spinal Cord Injury Patients.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2025Article
- Machine Learning for Predicting Critical Events Among Hospitalized Children.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- The African Critical Illness Outcomes Study (ACIOS): a point prevalence study of critical illness in 22 nations in Africa.Lancet (London, England) · 2025Article
- Formal guidelines from an expert panel: intensive care unit medical staffing, organisation and working hours to improve quality of life at work in France.Annals of intensive care · 2025Article
- Transition experiences of patients and families upon discharge from intensive care: a scoping review.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2025Article
- A national survey of Intensive Care Medicine Services in Portugal: where we are and the road ahead.Critical care science · 2025Article
- Prediction of inpatient mortality in hospitalised children in low- and middle-income countries: An external validation of paediatric mortality risk scores.Journal of global health · 2024Article
- Research priorities for the study of atrial fibrillation during acute and critical illness: recommendations from the Symposium on Atrial Fibrillation in Acute and Critical Care.BMC proceedings · 2024Article
- Health care workers' experiences of calling-for-help when taking care of critically ill patients in hospitals in Tanzania and Kenya.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Article
- Prolonged intensive care: muscular functional, and nutritional insights from the COVID-19 pandemic.Acute and critical care · 2024Article
- Creation and Expansion of a Mixed Patient Intermediate Care Unit to Improve ICU Capacity.Critical care explorations · 2023Article
- ICU without borders.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Until relatively recently, critical illness was considered as a separate entity and the intensive care unit (ICU), often a little cut-off from other areas of the hospital, was in many cases used as a last resort for patients so severely ill that it was no longer possible to care for them on the general ward. However, we are increasingly realizing that critical illness should be seen as just one part of the patient's disease trajectory and how the patient is managed before and after ICU admission has an important role to play in optimizing outcomes. Identifying critical illness early, before it reaches a stage where it is life-threatening, is a challenge and requires a combination of improved and more frequent or continuous monitoring of at-risk patients, staff training to recognize when a patient is deteriorating, a system to "call for help," and an effective response to that call. Critical care doctors are now widely available 24 h a day for consultation, and many hospitals have rapid response or medical emergency teams composed of staff trained in intensive care and with resuscitation skills who can attend patients on the ward who have been identified to be deteriorating, assess them to determine the need for ICU admission, and initiate further tests and/or initial therapy. Early intensivist input may also be important for patients undergoing interventions that are likely to result in ICU admission, e.g., transplantation or cardiac surgery. The patient's continuum after ICU discharge must also be taken into account during their ICU stay, with attempts made to limit the longer-term physical and psychological consequences of critical illness as much as possible. Minimal sedation, good communication, and early mobilization are three factors that can help patients survive their ICU stay with minimal sequelae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.