Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31200705›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Determinants of the quality of care relationships in long-term care - a participatory study.

Aukelien Scheffelaar, Michelle Hendriks, Nanne Bos, Katrien Luijkx, Sandra van Dulmen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aukelien ScheffelaarNivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands. aukelienscheffelaar@hotmail.com.
Michelle HendriksReinier van Arkel, Den Bosch, The Netherlands.
Nanne BosNivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Katrien LuijkxTilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tranzo, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Sandra van DulmenNivel (Netherlands institute for health services research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 516012506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe quality of the care relationship between a client and a professional is important in long-term care, as most clients depend on support for a lengthy period. The three largest client groups who receive long-term care in the Netherlands are older adults who are physically or mentally frail, people with mental health problems and people with intellectual disabilities. There is little clarity about how generic and variable the determinants of the quality of care relationships are across these client groups. The aim of this study is to explore and compare the determinants of the quality of care relationships in these three client groups in long-term care.

methodsThis participatory study involving clients as co-researchers was held in three healthcare organizations, each providing long-term care to one client group. The research was conducted by three teams consisting of researchers and co-researchers. We interviewed clients individually and professionals in focus groups. The focus was on care relationships with professionals where there is weekly recurring contact for at least 3 months. Clients and professionals were selected using a convenience sample. The interviews were coded in open, axial and selective coding. The outcomes were compared between the client groups.

resultsThe study sample consisted of 30 clients and 29 professionals. Determinants were categorized into four levels: client, professional, between client and professional, and context. The findings show that the majority of the determinants apply to the care relationships within all three client groups. At the professional level, eleven generic determinants were found. Eight determinants emerged at the client level of which two were found in two client groups only. At the level between a client and a professional, six determinants were found of which one applied to mental healthcare and disability care only. Five determinants were found at the contextual level of which two were specific for two client groups.

conclusionsThe study yielded a variety of determinants that came to the fore in all three client groups in long-term care. This suggests that including a homogenous client group from a single care setting is not necessary when studying the quality of long-term care relationships.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareAgedCommunicationFemaleFrail ElderlyHumansLong-Term CareMaleNetherlandsPatient SatisfactionPersonal AutonomyProfessional-Patient RelationsRespectCare relationshipClient participationClient perspectiveClient-professional relationshipLong-term careProfessional perspectiveQualitative researchQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID31200705
PMCPMC6570956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.