Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31200700›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Disparities in breast screening, stage at diagnosis, cancer treatment and the subsequent risk of cancer death: a retrospective, matched cohort of aboriginal and non-aboriginal women with breast cancer.

David Banham, David Roder, Dorothy Keefe, Gelareh Farshid, Marion Eckert, Natasha Howard, Karla Canuto, Alex Brown, CanDAD Aboriginal Community Reference Group and other CanDAD investigators

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Gland surgery · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David BanhamWardliparingga Aboriginal Research Unit, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. david.banham@sahmri.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6869-7236
David RoderSchool of Health Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Dorothy KeefeSA Cancer Services, SA Health, Hindmarsh Square, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Gelareh FarshidFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Marion EckertSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Natasha HowardSchool of Health Sciences, Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Karla CanutoWardliparingga Aboriginal Research Unit, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Alex BrownWardliparingga Aboriginal Research Unit, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
CanDAD Aboriginal Community Reference Group and other CanDAD investigators
University of South Australia · AUSA Health · AUSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1072243Sylvia and Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation Senior Medical Research FellowshipThe BeatCancer Project (Au) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAustralia's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women have poorer survival and twice the disease burden from breast cancer compared to other Australian women. These disparities are influenced, but not fully explained, by more diagnoses at later stages. Incorporating breast screening, hospital and out of hospital treatment and cancer registry records into a person-linked data system can improve our understanding of breast cancer outcomes. We focussed one such system on a population-based cohort of Aboriginal women in South Australia diagnosed with breast cancer and a matched cohort of non-Aboriginal women with breast cancer. We quantify Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal women's contact with publicly funded screening mammograms; quantify exposure to a selection of cancer treatment modalities; then assess the relationship between screening, treatment and the subsequent risk of breast cancer death.

methodsBreast cancers registered among Aboriginal women in South Australia in 1990-2010 (N = 77) were matched with a random selection of non-Aboriginal women by birth and diagnostic year, then linked to screening records, and treatment 2 months before and 13 months after diagnosis. Competing risk regression summarised associations of Aboriginality, breast screening, cancer stage and treatment with risk of breast cancer death.

resultsAboriginal women were less likely to have breast screening (OR = 0.37, 95%CIs 0.19-0.73); systemic therapies (OR = 0.49, 95%CIs 0.24-0.97); and, surgical intervention (OR = 0.35, 95%CIs 0.15-0.83). Where surgery occurred, mastectomy was more common among Aboriginal women (OR = 2.58, 1.22-5.46). Each of these factors influenced the risk of cancer death, reported as sub-hazard ratios (SHR). Regional spread disease (SHR = 34.23 95%CIs 6.76-13.40) and distant spread (SHR = 49.67 95%CIs 6.79-363.51) carried more risk than localised disease (Reference SHR = 1). Breast screening reduced the risk (SHR = 0.07 95%CIs 0.01-0.83). So too did receipt of systemic therapy (SHR = 0.06 95%CIs 0.01-0.41) and surgical treatments (SHR = 0.17 95%CIs 0.04-0.74). In the presence of adjustment for these factors, Aboriginality did not further explain the risk of breast cancer death.

conclusionUnder-exposure to screening and treatment of Aboriginal women with breast cancers in South Australia contributed to excess cancer deaths. Improved access, utilisation and quality of effective treatments is needed to improve survival after breast cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

AdultAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services, IndigenousHumansMammographyMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRegistriesResearchRetrospective StudiesAboriginalBreast cancerCancer screeningCancer treatmentIndigenousSurvival

Identifiers

PMID31200700
PMCPMC6570827
OpenAlexW2952603553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.