Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31200697›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2019

Who should decide about children's and adolescents' participation in health research? The views of children and adults in rural Kenya.

Vicki Marsh, Nancy Mwangome, Irene Jao, Katharine Wright, Sassy Molyneux, Alun Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. EMPATIA: A Guide for Communicating the Diagnosis of Neuromuscular Diseases.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ethical guidelines for human research on children and adolescents: A narrative review study.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Researchers, authors and consent.Case reports in women's health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vicki MarshKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Wellcome Trust Research Institute, PO Box 230, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya. vmarsh@kemri-wellcome.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5178-4250
Nancy MwangomeKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Wellcome Trust Research Institute, PO Box 230, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya.
Irene JaoKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Wellcome Trust Research Institute, PO Box 230, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya.
Katharine WrightUK Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 28 Bedford Square, London, WC1B 3JS, UK.
Sassy MolyneuxKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Wellcome Trust Research Institute, PO Box 230, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya.
Alun DaviesKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Wellcome Trust Research Institute, PO Box 230, Kilifi, 80108, Kenya.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 092654/Z/10/AWellcome Trust 096527Wellcome Trust WT085418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternational research guidance has shifted towards an increasingly proactive inclusion of children and adolescents in health research in recognition of the need for more evidence-based treatment. Strong calls have been made for the active involvement of children and adolescents in developing research proposals and policies, including in decision-making about research participation. Much evidence and debate on this topic has focused on high-income settings, while the greatest health burdens and research gaps occur in low-middle income countries, highlighting the need to take account of voices from more diverse contexts.

methodsBetween January and March 2014, 56 community representatives and secondary school students were involved in eight group discussions to explore views on the acceptability of involving children and adolescents in research, and how these groups should be involved in decision-making about their own participation. Discussions were voice-recorded and transcriptions analyzed using Framework Analysis, combining deductive and inductive approaches.

resultsAcross these discussions, the idea of involving children and adolescents in decision-making about research participation was strongly supported given similar levels of responsibility carried in everyday life; existing capacity that should be recognized; the opportunity for learning involved; varying levels of parental control; and generational shifts towards greater understanding of science for adolescents than their parents. Joint decision-making processes were supported for older children and adolescents, with parental control influenced by perceptions of the risks involved in participation.

conclusionsMoves towards more active involvement of children and adolescents in planning studies and in making decisions about their participation are supported by these findings from Kenya. Important emerging considerations include the need to take account of the nature of proposed studies and prevailing attitudes and understanding of research in identifying children's and adolescents' roles. More research is needed to expand diversity and develop approaches to joint assent and consent processes that would fairly represent children's and adolescents' wishes and interests, towards their long term benefit.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAdolescentAdultChildCommunity ParticipationDecision MakingEthics, ResearchFemaleHumansInformed Consent By MinorsKenyaMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionRural PopulationYoung AdultAdolescentsAfricaAssent in childrenChildrenEmpirical ethicsHealth ResearchInformed consentKenya

Identifiers

PMID31200697
PMCPMC6570858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.