Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31200591›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

Essential Oils as a Feed Additives: Pharmacokinetics and Potential Toxicity in Monogastric Animals.

Pavel Horky, Sylvie Skalickova, Kristyna Smerkova, Jiri Skladanka

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Integrative Toxicology Profiling ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  4. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Hydroxypropyl Cellulose Hydrogel ContainingGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pavel HorkyDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Forage Production, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic. pavel.horky@mendelu.cz.
Sylvie SkalickovaDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Forage Production, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic. sylvie.skalickova@gmail.com.
Kristyna SmerkovaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic. kristyna.smerkova@mendelu.cz.
Jiri SkladankaDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Forage Production, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic. jiri.skladanka@mendelu.cz.
Mendel University in Brno · CZ

Funding

Technologická Agentura České Republiky TH04030172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Essential oils (EOs) are now a hot topic in finding modern substitutes for antibiotics. Many studies have shown positive results and confirmed their high antibacterial activity both in vitro and in vivo. Deservedly, there is an attempt to use EOs as a substitute for antibiotics, which are currently limited by legislation in animal breeding. Given the potential of EOs, studies on their fate in the body need to be summarized. The content of EO

Indexed as

antibiotic alternativesgenomenatural growth promotersphytogenics

Identifiers

PMID31200591
PMCPMC6617186
OpenAlexW2950953219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.