ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019
Genome Editing in Agriculture: Technical and Practical Considerations.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Which Factors Affect the Occurrence of Off-Target Effects Caused by the Use of CRISPR/Cas: A Systematic Review in Plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Pooled it
- CRISPR-Cas systems for enhancing chilling tolerance in rice: recent advances and future prospects.Biologia futura · 2026Review
- Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- Genome Editing and Improvement of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The economics and policy of genome editing in crop improvement.The plant genome · 2023Review
- Development of a facile genetic transformation system for the Spanish elite rice paella genotype Bomba.Transgenic research · 2022Article
- In Vivo Rapid Investigation of CRISPR-Based Base Editing Components inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- From Genome Sequencing to CRISPR-Based Genome Editing for Climate-Resilient Forest Trees.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- To become more sustainable organic agriculture needs genome editing technology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Will Plant Genome Editing Play a Decisive Role in "Quantum-Leap" Improvements in Crop Yield to Feed an Increasing Global Human Population?Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Genome editing reagent delivery in plants.Transgenic research · 2021Review
- Integrating Omics and Gene Editing Tools for Rapid Improvement of Traditional Food Plants for Diversified and Sustainable Food Security.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Fruit crops in the era of genome editing: closing the regulatory gap.Plant cell reports · 2021Review
- Herbicide Resistance: Another Hot Agronomic Trait for Plant Genome Editing.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Article
- Genomics Armed With Diversity Leads the Way inFrontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Using Network-Based Machine Learning to Predict Transcription Factors Involved in Drought Resistance.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Perspectives for Buck Kids in Dairy Goat Farming.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Review
- Optimizing sgRNA to Improve CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Efficiency: Special Focus on Human and Animal Cell.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- CRISPR/Cas9: A Robust Genome-Editing Tool with Versatile Functions and Endless Application.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of precise genome-editing tools has revolutionized the way we create new plant varieties. Three groups of tools are now available, classified according to their mechanism of action: Programmable sequence-specific nucleases, base-editing enzymes, and oligonucleotides. The corresponding techniques not only lead to different outcomes, but also have implications for the public acceptance and regulatory approval of genome-edited plants. Despite the high efficiency and precision of the tools, there are still major bottlenecks in the generation of new and improved varieties, including the efficient delivery of the genome-editing reagents, the selection of desired events, and the regeneration of intact plants. In this review, we evaluate current delivery and regeneration methods, discuss their suitability for important crop species, and consider the practical aspects of applying the different genome-editing techniques in agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.