Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31200493›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Biocontrol of Cereal Crop Diseases Using Streptomycetes.

Jake T Newitt, Samuel M M Prudence, Matthew I Hutchings, Sarah F Worsley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring the antifungal activity of the wheat microbiome.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of planting density on the growth ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jake T NewittSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, UK. j.newitt@uea.ac.uk.
Samuel M M PrudenceSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, UK. s.prudence@uea.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1749-8787
Matthew I HutchingsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, UK. m.hutchings@uea.ac.uk.
Sarah F WorsleySchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, UK. s.worsley@uea.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4736-0938

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011216/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/L002582/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing world population and an increasing demand for greater food production requires that crop losses caused by pests and diseases are dramatically reduced. Concurrently, sustainability targets mean that alternatives to chemical pesticides are becoming increasingly desirable. Bacteria in the plant root microbiome can protect their plant host against pests and pathogenic infection. In particular,

Indexed as

biocontrolcerealsrhizosphereroot microbiomeStreptomyces

Identifiers

PMID31200493
PMCPMC6630304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.