ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2019
Splenomesenteric bypass as revascularisation technique after iatrogenic injury of the superior mesenteric artery during radical nephrectomy: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visceral Artery Injuries during Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review of Published Cases.EJVES vascular forum · 2026Review
- Surgical complication of SMA and celiac artery ligation during radical nephrectomy for large renal tumor: A fatal outcome.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Extrarenal Visceral Arteries Injuries during Left Radical Nephrectomy: A 50-Year Continuing Problem.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Superior Mesenteric Artery Injury during Robotic Radical Nephrectomy: Scenarios and Management Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Superior Mesenteric Artery Injury During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: A Robotic Nightmare.European urology open science · 2022Article
- Revascularisation of iatrogenic superior mesenteric artery injury by end to end anastomosis during robot assisted nephrectomy.International journal of surgery case reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIatrogenic vascular injuries during radical nephrectomy are rarely reported. In the case of an injury of the superior mesenteric artery, the consequences for the patient are potentially catastrophic. It occurs more frequently in patients with large renal tumors, due to the presence of bulky perihilar adenopathies, or in cases of pyelonephritis. In most cases, the inadvertent injury of the artery occurs due to the difficulty in distinguishing it from the left renal artery. CASE: 69-year-old male, with a malignant neoplasm of the left kidney with the involvement of the tail of the pancreas, tumor thrombus in the left renal vein and multiple left para-aortic adenopathies, whose histological examination revealed to be a renal sarcomatoid carcinoma pT4N1M0G3. A radical nephrectomy was performed with caudal splenopancreatectomy and left paraaortic lymphadenectomy, with an iatrogenic injury of the superior mesenteric artery at its origin. A terminoterminal anastomosis was performed from the proximal stump of the splenic artery. The postoperative period went uneventfully. Control imaging in the follow-up showed permeability of the celiac trunk and the superior mesenteric artery.
conclusionsIntra-operative superior mesenteric artery injury should be promptly identified and repaired to prevent gut ischemia and all its dire consequences. There are different repair options, and the technique should be chosen according to the degree of injury. The splenomesenteric bypass has numerous advantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.