Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31199916›Full record

ReviewCell2019

Autophagy-Independent Functions of the Autophagy Machinery.

Lorenzo Galluzzi, Douglas R Green

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 511 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
511citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

511 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Autophagy modulation in cancer.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Intracellular Crosstalk of the Gasotransmitter Trio (NO, CO, HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

451 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lorenzo GalluzziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Université Paris Descartes/Paris V, Paris, France. Electronic address: deadoc80@gmail.com.
Douglas R GreenDepartment of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. Electronic address: douglas.green@stjude.org.

Funding

Non-canonical functions of autophagy proteinsR01AI040646 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI GREEN, DOUGLAS R. · 1997 to 2023
$8.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI040646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macroautophagy (herein referred to as autophagy) is an evolutionary ancient mechanism that culminates with the lysosomal degradation of superfluous or potentially dangerous cytosolic entities. Over the past 2 decades, the molecular mechanisms underlying several variants of autophagy have been characterized in detail. Accumulating evidence suggests that most, if not all, components of the molecular machinery for autophagy also mediate autophagy-independent functions. Here, we discuss emerging data on the non-autophagic functions of autophagy-relevant proteins.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutophagyAutophagy-Related ProteinsHumansLysosomesAutophagy-Related ProteinsATG5BECN1LC3-associated phagocytosisproliferationregulated cell deathvesicular trafficking

Identifiers

PMID31199916
PMCPMC7173070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.