ArticlePloS one2019
Improving care for pregnant women with suspected influenza: A retrospective study before and after introduction of a rapid molecular assay.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Causes and consequences of fever during pregnancy: A retrospective study in a gynaecological emergency department.Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction · 2020Article
- A sticking point for rapid flu tests?Nature · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDuring winter, after excluding obvious sites of infection, the most important diagnoses of isolated fever or influenza-like illness (ILI) to rule out are listeriosis and influenza, because of their severe potential outcomes and the straightforward management available for each. While awaiting laboratory results, the recommended management strategy is usually hospitalization for intravenous antibiotic therapy against potential listeria. This study sought to assess the effect of the use of a rapid test on hospitalization and antibiotic therapy rates.
methodsThe study included all pregnant women who consulted for ILI or isolated fever after clinical and laboratory investigations and had a molecular diagnostic assay for influenza during two time periods, both during influenza epidemics: before introduction of the rapid molecular assay use (period 1) and after this (period 2).
resultsThe study included 38 women during period 1 and 124 during period 2. The influenza diagnosis was confirmed for 24 of 38 (63.2%) women during period 1 and 65 of 124 (52.4%) women during period 2 (P = 0.24). The hospitalization rate fell significantly from period 1 to period 2, both in the total population (71.0% versus 44.3%, P = 0.004) and among women with confirmed influenza (83.3% versus 38.5%, P<0.001), as did the antibiotic therapy rate in both groups (respectively, 86.8% versus 56.1%, P = 0.001 and 91.7% versus 44.7%, P<0.001).
conclusionThe use of a rapid molecular assay for the diagnosis of influenza improved the management of pregnant women with an isolated fever or ILI by reducing the rates of unnecessary hospitalization and antibiotic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.