Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31199447›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2019

Assessment of a Parent-Child Interaction Intervention for Language Development in Children.

Dimitri A Christakis, Sarah J Lowry, Georgia Goldberg, Heather Violette, Michelle M Garrison

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Screen-based media and young children: Review and recommendations.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dimitri A ChristakisDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle.
Sarah J LowrySeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Georgia GoldbergSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Heather VioletteSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Michelle M GarrisonSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Parent-child interactions are critical for language development in early life. Objective: To test whether a clinic-based intervention was associated with improved home language environment and language development. Design, Setting, and Participants: A pre-post study of a multifaceted clinic-based intervention called Talk It Up was conducted for 61 English- or Spanish-speaking families with children aged 2 to 12 months. Enrollment took place at a single urban pediatric clinic from January to November 2017, with follow-up data collection through May 2018. Analyses took place from June to August 2018. Interventions: The 6-month multifaceted intervention consisted of delivering Language Environment Analysis word counts with clinician feedback, coaching, and twice-weekly pushes of brief instructional videos via a commercially available smartphone application. Main Outcomes and Measures: Baseline and follow-up z scores for adult word counts, parent-child conversational turns, and child vocalizations and language development as measured by the Developmental Snapshot score were compared and adjusted for confounders. Results: Among 61 families, the mean (SD) child's age at baseline was 5.9 (3.3) months. English was the primary language spoken in the home for 54 families (89%). At follow-up, Talk It Up was associated with significant improvements in adult word counts (mean z score, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.05-0.55), parent-child conversational turns (mean z score, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.002-0.59), and Developmental Snapshot score (mean, 6.59; 95% CI, 0.95-12.23), but there were no improvements in child vocalizations (mean z score, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.49 to 0.24). Conclusions and Relevance: A multifaceted clinic-based approach to promote parent-child interactions holds some promise. Future, larger studies are warranted.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentMobile ApplicationsParent-Child RelationsChild LanguageFeedbackHumansInfantParentsPilot ProjectsUrban HealthVideo RecordingVocabulary

Identifiers

PMID31199447
PMCPMC6575141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.