Trial reportJAMA network open2019
Assessment of a Parent-Child Interaction Intervention for Language Development in Children.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Safe Early Intervention Approach: A 3-Year Follow-Up.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Effortful control and expressive language in deaf or hard-of-hearing children: The contributions of caregiver language and parenting stress.Journal of child language · 2026Article
- Mobile App-Based Interventions to Support Maternal Roles in Child Nutrition and Development: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- A scoping review of Spanish language pediatric digital health interventions.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2025Article
- Article
- Screen-based media and young children: Review and recommendations.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2021Review
- Comparing Automatic and Manual Measures of Parent-Infant Conversational Turns: A Word of Caution.Child development · 2021Article
- Automatized analysis of children's exposure to child-directed speech in reschool settings: Validation and application.PloS one · 2020Article
- Communication Skills and Communicative Autonomy of Prelinguistic Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children: Application of a Video Feedback Intervention.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Caregiver Language Input in Different Engagement States During Play Interactions With Toddlers With Autism: An Observational Study.Autism & developmental language impairmentsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Parent-child interactions are critical for language development in early life. Objective: To test whether a clinic-based intervention was associated with improved home language environment and language development. Design, Setting, and Participants: A pre-post study of a multifaceted clinic-based intervention called Talk It Up was conducted for 61 English- or Spanish-speaking families with children aged 2 to 12 months. Enrollment took place at a single urban pediatric clinic from January to November 2017, with follow-up data collection through May 2018. Analyses took place from June to August 2018. Interventions: The 6-month multifaceted intervention consisted of delivering Language Environment Analysis word counts with clinician feedback, coaching, and twice-weekly pushes of brief instructional videos via a commercially available smartphone application. Main Outcomes and Measures: Baseline and follow-up z scores for adult word counts, parent-child conversational turns, and child vocalizations and language development as measured by the Developmental Snapshot score were compared and adjusted for confounders. Results: Among 61 families, the mean (SD) child's age at baseline was 5.9 (3.3) months. English was the primary language spoken in the home for 54 families (89%). At follow-up, Talk It Up was associated with significant improvements in adult word counts (mean z score, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.05-0.55), parent-child conversational turns (mean z score, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.002-0.59), and Developmental Snapshot score (mean, 6.59; 95% CI, 0.95-12.23), but there were no improvements in child vocalizations (mean z score, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.49 to 0.24). Conclusions and Relevance: A multifaceted clinic-based approach to promote parent-child interactions holds some promise. Future, larger studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.