ArticleHealth policy and planning2019
The process of prioritization of non-communicable diseases in the global health policy arena.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- How to dampen the surge of non-communicable diseases in Southeast Asia: insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis.Health policy and planning · 2022Pooled it
- Using routine health information data for research in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2020Pooled it
- Implementation and evaluation of an insulin use manual in the public health system of a Peruvian Region: a mixed-methods study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Global governance strategies for managing NCDs in the context of climate change: Protocol of scoping review.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Maximizing researcher-policymaker engagement in global public health.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- A realist evaluation of the implementation of a national tobacco control programme and policy in India.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
- Hypertension and its determinants in Abu Dhabi population: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of hypertension · 2025Article
- Access to hypertension services and health-seeking experiences in rural Coastal Kenya: A qualitative study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- How do high-level African directors of policy and planning operationalize health equity? Findings from a regional survey.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Health disparities and inequalities in prevalence of diabetes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Addressing chronic diseases: a comparative study of policies towards type-2 diabetes and hypertension in selected European countries.European journal of public health · 2024Article
- How integration of refugees into national health systems became a global priority: a qualitative policy analysis.Conflict and health · 2024Article
- Generating Political Priority for the Health Needs of the 21st Century: A Qualitative Policy Analysis on the Prioritization of Rehabilitation Services in Uganda.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Article
- Human resources challenges in the management of diabetes and hypertension in Mozambique.PloS one · 2024Article
- Progress and challenges in implementing non-communicable disease policies in Sudan.Health research policy and systems · 2023Review
- Context and priorities for health systems strengthening for pain and disability in low- and middle-income countries: a secondary qualitative study and content analysis of health policies.Health policy and planning · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, the global policy response has not been commensurate with their health, economic and social burden. This study examined factors facilitating and hampering the prioritization of NCDs on the United Nations (UN) health agenda. Shiffman and Smith's (Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality. The Lancet 370: 1370-9.) political priority framework served as a structure for analysis of a review of NCD policy documents identified through the World Health Organization's (WHO) NCD Global Action Plan 2013-20, and complemented by 11 semi-structured interviews with key informants from different sectors. The results show that a cohesive policy community exists, and leaders are present, however, actor power does not extend beyond the health sector and the role of guiding institutions and civil society have only recently gained momentum. The framing of NCDs as four risk factors and four diseases does not necessarily resonate with experts from the larger policy community, but the economic argument seems to have enabled some traction to be gained. While many policy windows have occurred, their impact has been limited by the institutional constraints of the WHO. Credible indicators and effective interventions exist, but their applicability globally, especially in low- and middle-income countries, is questionable. To be effective, the NCD movement needs to expand beyond global health experts, foster civil society and develop a broader and more inclusive global governance structure. Applying the Shiffman and Smith framework for NCDs enabled different elements of how NCDs were able to get on the UN policy agenda to be disentangled. Much work has been done to frame the challenges and solutions, but implementation processes and their applicability remain challenging globally. NCD responses need to be adapted to local contexts, focus sufficiently on both prevention and management of disease, and have a stronger global governance structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.