Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31199438›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

GMSimpute: a generalized two-step Lasso approach to impute missing values in label-free mass spectrum analysis.

Qian Li, Kate Fisher, Wenjun Meng, Bin Fang, Eric Welsh, Eric B Haura, John M Koomen, Steven A Eschrich, Brooke L Fridley, Y Ann Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qian LiHealth Informatics Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Kate FisherDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Wenjun MengDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Bin FangProteomics and Metabolomics Core Facility, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Eric WelshDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Eric B HauraDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
John M KoomenDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Steven A EschrichDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Brooke L FridleyDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Y Ann ChenDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI Christine O'Connell · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
GOLDILOKs: Project 2: TranslationalU54HD090258 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSP (KANSAS CITY, MO) · PI SODEN, SARAH · 2016 to 2018
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMissingness in label-free mass spectrometry is inherent to the technology. A computational approach to recover missing values in metabolomics and proteomics datasets is important. Most existing methods are designed under a particular assumption, either missing at random or under the detection limit. If the missing pattern deviates from the assumption, it may lead to biased results. Hence, we investigate the missing patterns in free mass spectrometry data and develop an omnibus approach GMSimpute, to allow effective imputation accommodating different missing patterns.

resultsThree proteomics datasets and one metabolomics dataset indicate missing values could be a mixture of abundance-dependent and abundance-independent missingness. We assess the performance of GMSimpute using simulated data (with a wide range of 80 missing patterns) and metabolomics data from the Cancer Genome Atlas breast cancer and clear cell renal cell carcinoma studies. Using Pearson correlation and normalized root mean square errors between the true and imputed abundance, we compare its performance to K-nearest neighbors' type approaches, Random Forest, GSimp, a model-based method implemented in DanteR and minimum values. The results indicate GMSimpute provides higher accuracy in imputation and exhibits stable performance across different missing patterns. In addition, GMSimpute is able to identify the features in downstream differential expression analysis with high accuracy when applied to the Cancer Genome Atlas datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GMSimpute is on CRAN: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/GMSimpute/index.html. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMass SpectrometryBiasCluster AnalysisLimit of DetectionMetabolomicsProteomics

Identifiers

PMID31199438
PMCPMC6956786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.